...
首页> 外文期刊>Total Quality Management & Business Excellence >Firm performance, corporate governance and executive compensation in high-tech businesses
【24h】

Firm performance, corporate governance and executive compensation in high-tech businesses

机译:高科技企业的公司绩效,公司治理和高管薪酬

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Most previous researchers believe that the connection between executive compensation and company performance will resolve agency problems between the principal and the agent. However, this method will lead to an unlimited increase in agency costs and make executives pay attention to only short-term company performance, therefore ignoring long-term growth. Thus, this research includes firm performance and two other mechanisms, institutional investors and boards directors, to assess the impact of these on executive compensation. The samples used in this study were listed companies in high-tech businesses during 2004-2006. This article's conclusion is as follows: (1) executive compensation as a control mechanism to reduce the agency problem is applied efficiently to high-tech businesses; (2) executive compensation will be lower when institutional investors' control is relatively effective. This explains the substitutive characteristic between pay-for-performance and control mechanisms from corporate governance.
机译:以前的大多数研究人员认为,高管薪酬与公司绩效之间的联系将解决委托人与代理人之间的代理问题。但是,这种方法将导致代理商成本的无限增加,并使高管仅关注公司的短期绩效,因此忽略了长期增长。因此,本研究包括公司绩效和其他两个机制,即机构投资者和董事会,以评估这些对高管薪酬的影响。本研究使用的样本是2004-2006年间高科技行业的上市公司。本文的结论如下:(1)将高管薪酬作为减少代理问题的控制机制,已有效地应用于高科技企业; (2)当机构投资者的控制相对有效时,高管薪酬将降低。这就解释了绩效报酬与公司治理控制机制之间的替代特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号