...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Sensitivity comparison of two Food and Drug Administration-licensed, triplex nucleic acid test automated assays for hepatitis B virus DNA detection and associated projections of United States yield.
【24h】

Sensitivity comparison of two Food and Drug Administration-licensed, triplex nucleic acid test automated assays for hepatitis B virus DNA detection and associated projections of United States yield.

机译:两种食品和药物管理局许可的三联核酸测试自动测定法对乙型肝炎病毒DNA检测的敏感性比较以及美国产量的相关预测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: There have been no comparisons of the relative sensitivity of the two Food and Drug Administration-licensed multiplex (MPX) nucleic acid test (NAT) systems (Procleix Ultrio [Gen-Probe], TIGRIS platform [Novartis]; and cobas TaqScreen MPX [Roche Molecular Systems], cobas s 201 platform [Roche Instrument Center]) for detecting hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected donors in minipool sizes (MP) used in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Routine blood samples from Thailand were obtained from plasma units from 129 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative, HBV NAT-yield donations. Blinded US testing included antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), NAT using both manufacturers' systems (undiluted-individual donation [ID], in singlet and diluted 1:6 and 1:16 in triplicate), quantitative antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen, HBV DNA viral loads, and HBV genotyping. HBV yields in the United States were estimated using the incidence/window period (WP) model and compared to the calculated assay sensitivities. RESULTS: Eighty samples were classified as occult HBV (anti-HBc reactive) and 49 as WP (anti-HBc nonreactive). For US pool sizes, MPX detected significantly more samples than Ultrio (MPX MP6 vs. Ultrio MP16; p < 0.0001 for occult and WP). Ultrio MP16 results were not statistically different from Ultrio MP6 (p = 0.68 for occu p = 0.42 for WP). There was no difference between platforms for MP sizes used in most of the world (MPX MP6 vs. Ultrio ID; p = 0.70 for occult and p = 0.34 for WP). Viral loads were higher in WP samples. Modeled yield estimates were consistent with measured assay sensitivity on the Thai donor samples. CONCLUSIONS: As used in the United States, MPX MP6 is more sensitive than Ultrio MP16, but the impact of this difference is mitigated by low numbers of HBV WP infections.
机译:背景:目前尚无两个美国食品药品监督管理局许可的多重(MPX)核酸测试(NAT)系统(Procleix Ultrio [Gen-Probe],TIGRIS平台[Novartis]和cobas TaqScreen MPX)的相对灵敏度的比较。 [Roche Molecular Systems],cobas s 201平台[Roche Instrument Center]),用于检测在美国使用的微型池大小(MP)中感染乙肝病毒(HBV)的供体。研究设计和方法:从129例乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)阴性,HBV NAT产量捐献的血浆单位中获得泰国的常规血样。美国的盲法测试包括针对乙型肝炎核心抗原(anti-HBc)的抗体,使用两家制造商系统的NAT(未稀释的个人捐赠[ID],单重和稀释的1:6和1:16的三份),定量的肝炎抗体B表面抗原,HBV DNA病毒载量和HBV基因分型。美国的HBV产量是使用发病率/窗期(WP)模型估算的,并与计算出的测定灵敏度进行比较。结果:80个样本被分类为隐匿性HBV(抗HBc反应性),49个样本为WP(抗HBc非反应性)。对于US池大小,MPX检测到的样本明显多于Ultrio(MPX MP6与Ultrio MP16;对于隐秘和WP,p <0.0001)。 Ultrio MP16的结果与Ultrio MP6的差异无统计学意义(隐匿性的p = 0.68; WP的p = 0.42)。在世界上大多数国家/地区使用的MP大小平台之间没有差异(MPX MP6与Ultrio ID;对于隐匿性,p = 0.70;对于WP,p = 0.34)。 WP样品中病毒载量较高。建模的收率估算值与泰国供体样品上测得的测定灵敏度一致。结论:在美国使用的MPX MP6比Ultrio MP16更敏感,但是由于HBV WP感染数量少,这种差异的影响得以缓解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号