...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Validation of an automated immunoglobulin G-only cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody screening assay and an assessment of the risk of transfusion transmitted CMV from seronegative blood.
【24h】

Validation of an automated immunoglobulin G-only cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody screening assay and an assessment of the risk of transfusion transmitted CMV from seronegative blood.

机译:验证自动免疫球蛋白G巨细胞病毒(CMV)抗体筛选试验的有效性,并评估从血清阴性血液中传播CMV的输血风险。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody donor screening assays have predominantly included both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) detection. However, since in the majority of cases both CMV IgG and IgM are detected concomitantly during early seroconversion, CMV assays based only on IgG are now widely applied for donor screening. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The performance of an automated microparticle CMV IgG assay (Abbott AxSYM CMV IgG microparticle enzyme immunoassay [MEIA]) was compared with an established total antibody blood screening assay (Abbott CMV Total AB EIA). Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using 5050 random blood donors and 13 seroconversion panels. A risk analysis was undertaken to estimate the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV) from presumptive seronegative blood components. RESULTS: The EIA achieved marginally (but not significantly) better resolved sensitivity (100%) than the AxSYM IgG assay (99.93%). The AxSYM IgG resolved specificity (99.34%) was superior to the EIA (96.4%). This superiority was maintained (98.61%) when a modified cutoff was applied to the AxSYM IgG assay to achieve 100 percent resolved sensitivity. The seroconversion sensitivities of the EIA and the AxSYM IgG were equivalent, detecting the same bleed as positive in the majority of the seroconversion panels tested. The median TT-CMV residual risk estimate for the two assays was approximately 1 in 66,000 (range, 42,000-165,000). CONCLUSION: The AxSYM IgG MEIA is suitable for blood donor screening and was optimized by applying a modified cutoff of 9 AU per mL. The modeling predicts that implementing the AxSYM IgG assay would not negatively impact the already very low risk of TT-CMV associated with seronegative blood components in Australia.
机译:背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)抗体供体筛选测定主要包括免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和免疫球蛋白M(IgM)检测。但是,由于在大多数情况下,在早期血清转化过程中会同时检测到CMV IgG和IgM,因此仅基于IgG的CMV测定法现在已广泛用于供体筛选。研究设计和方法:将自动微粒CMV IgG分析(Abbott AxSYM CMV IgG微粒酶免疫分析[MEIA])的性能与已建立的总抗体血液筛选分析(Abbott CMV Total AB EIA)进行了比较。使用5050个随机献血者和13个血清转化小组评估了敏感性和特异性。进行了风险分析,以估计推定的血清阴性血液成分来估计输血传播的CMV(TT-CMV)的残留风险。结果:与AxSYM IgG分析(99.93%)相比,EIA的分辨灵敏度(100%)略高(但不显着)。 AxSYM IgG分辨的特异性(99.34%)优于EIA(96.4%)。当将改良的临界值应用于AxSYM IgG分析以实现100%的分辨灵敏度时,可以保持这种优势(98.61%)。 EIA和AxSYM IgG的血清转化敏感性相同,在大多数测试的血清转化面板中检测到与阳性反应相同的出血。两种测定的TT-CMV残留风险中位数估计值约为66,000分之一(范围42,000-165,000)。结论:AxSYM IgG MEIA适用于献血者筛查,并通过应用9 AU / mL的改良临界值进行了优化。该模型预测,在澳大利亚实施AxSYM IgG检测不会对已经非常低的与血清阴性血清相关的TT-CMV风险产生负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号