...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Effects of high-yield thrombocytapheresis on the quality of platelet products.
【24h】

Effects of high-yield thrombocytapheresis on the quality of platelet products.

机译:高产量血小板减少对血小板产品质量的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The steadily increasing demands for single-donor apheresis platelet (PLT) concentrates (APCs) are a challenge to the PLT supply system. Therefore, efforts to improve plateletpheresis yield, allowing apheresis products to be split into 2 or more units, are valuable strategies. No data to demonstrate in vivo transfusion efficacy of these high-yield split-APCs are currently available, however. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The transfusion efficacy of APCs produced by two apheresis methods involving different harvest and storing procedures and varying PLT yields was investigated. Efficacy measures were the 1-hour percent PLT recovery (PPR(1h)) and the 1-hour corrected count increment (CCI(1h)). In total, 400 APCs, produced with either an Amicus device (Baxter) and stored in PLT additive solution (T-Sol; Amicus method [AM], n = 107) or a Trima device (Gambro) and stored in plasma (Trima method [TM], n = 293), were transfused to 55 children (31 girls; median age, 9.5 years; range, 0.2-18.5 years) with thrombocytopenia due to chemotherapy or aplastic anemia (median, 4 APCs per child; range, 1-68). RESULTS: Transfusion efficacy was significantly lower for AM-APCs than for TM-APCs (median PPR(1h), 17 and 33%; median CCI(1h), 7.9 and 15.6, respectively; p < 0.001). Reduced transfusion efficacy correlated in a yield-dependent manner with high apheresis PLT yields (> or =6 x 10(11)) for AM-APCs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although in vitro validation of AM- and TM-APCs has been performed, only by evaluating transfusion efficacy in vivo did the AM turn out to be not suitable for high-yield thrombocytapheresis. This study recommends the implementation of in vivo transfusion efficacy studies for high-yield APC apheresis donations.
机译:背景:对单供血单采血小板(PLT)浓缩物(APC)的需求不断增加,这对PLT供应系统构成了挑战。因此,努力提高血小板生成量,使血液分离产品分成两个或两个以上单元是有价值的策略。但是,目前尚无数据可证明这些高产率分裂式APC在体内的输血功效。研究设计和方法:研究了两种采血方法所产生的APC的输血功效,这些采血方法涉及不同的收获和储存程序以及不同的PLT产量。功效指标为1小时PLT恢复百分比(PPR(1h))和1小时校正计数增量(CCI(1h))。总共有400台APC,用Amicus装置(Baxter)生产并存储在PLT添加剂溶液(T-Sol; Amicus方法[AM],n = 107)或Trima装置(Gambro)中,并存储在血浆中(Trima方法) (TM),n = 293)输给55名因化疗或再生障碍性贫血(中位数,每名儿童4 APC;范围1)而患有血小板减少症的儿童(31名女孩;中位年龄为9.5岁;范围为0.2-18.5岁)(n = 293) -68)。结果:AM-APCs的输血功效显着低于TM-APCs(中值PPR(1h)为17%和33%;中位数CCI(1h)为7.9和15.6; p <0.001)。对于AM-APCs,降低的输血功效以产量依赖的方式与单采单采PLT的高产量(>或= 6 x 10(11))相关(p <0.001)。结论:尽管已经进行了AM-和TM-APC的体外验证,但仅通过评估体内的输血功效,AM才不适合高产率的血小板减少。这项研究建议对高产量的APC血液采血捐赠进行体内输注功效研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号