...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >In vitro and in vivo effects of prestorage filtration of apheresis platelets.
【24h】

In vitro and in vivo effects of prestorage filtration of apheresis platelets.

机译:储存和血液分离单采血小板的体外过滤效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The effect of prestorage filtration on the quality of apheresis platelet concentrates stored for transfusion is undetermined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Investigation of 11 plateletpheresis components used a concurrent paired-study design. On the day of collection, each component was equally divided into two suspensions; one half was filtered, and the other half was not. Each suspension was stored for 5 days. In vitro testing was performed on the day of collection (Day 0) for cell counts and on Day 5 for measurements of lactate, glucose, blood gases, pH, platelet ATP, hypotonic stress ratio, extent of shape change in response to ADP, tissue necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 8, interleukin 1 alpha, interleukin 1 beta, interleukin 6, and platelet surface glycoproteins by flow cytometry. At the end of the 5-day period, a sample was taken from each of the two suspensions, radiolabeled with either 51Cr or 111In, and transfused concurrently. Posttransfusion samples were drawn for measurements of recovery and platelet survival and for functional assessment of the ex vivo ability of the circulating radiolabeled platelets to aggregate in response to ADP. RESULTS: The apheresis component had a mean platelet yield of 3.2 +/- 0.4 x 10(11) and a white cell yield ranging from 1 x 10(5) to 1 x 10(8), with a median of 2 x 10(7). Filtration resulted in a platelet loss of approximately 10 percent and a variable 2 to 3 log10 reduction in white cell content. No significant differences between filtered and unfiltered suspensions in paired t tests that would likely have an impact on platelet quality were observed in the in vitro tests. The in vivo recovery and survival were highly similar and not statistically different in filtered and unfiltered paired suspensions: the mean difference was 1.2 +/- 4.0 percent for recovery and 7.0 +/- 15 hours for survival. The functional assessment by aggregation to ADP showed no difference between filtered and unfiltered suspensions. A small decrease in tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 8 was evident in the filtered suspension as compared to levels in the unfiltered suspensions. CONCLUSION: Prestorage white cell reduction in apheresis components resulted in WBC reduction by several log10 with no evident adverse effect on platelet viability or function.
机译:背景:储存前过滤对输血用单采血小板浓缩物质量的影响尚不确定。研究设计和方法:对11个血小板减少成分的研究使用了并行配对研究设计。在收集之日,每个成分均分为两个悬浮液;一半被过滤,另一半没有被过滤。每个悬浮液保存5天。在收集当天(第0天)进行体外测试以进行细胞计数,并在第5天进行乳酸,葡萄糖,血气,pH,血小板ATP,低渗应激比,对ADP响应的形状变化程度,组织的测量通过流式细胞术测定坏死因子α,白介素8,白介素1α,白介素1β,白介素6和血小板表面糖蛋白。 5天结束时,从两种悬浮液中分别取样,并用51Cr或111In进行放射性标记,并同时进行输血。抽取输血后样品用于测量恢复和血小板存活,并用于功能性评估循环放射性标记的血小板响应于ADP聚集的离体能力。结果:单采血液成分的平均血小板产量为3.2 +/- 0.4 x 10(11),白细胞产量为1 x 10(5)至1 x 10(8),中位数为2 x 10( 7)。过滤导致血小板损失约10%,白细胞含量减少2至3 log10。在体外试验中,在配对t试验中未过滤的悬浮液和未过滤的悬浮液之间没有显着差异,这可能会影响血小板质量。在过滤和未过滤的配对悬浮液中,体内恢复和存活率高度相似,且在统计学上没有差异:恢复率的平均差异为1.2 +/- 4.0%,存活率的平均差异为7.0 +/- 15小时。通过聚集到ADP进行的功能评估表明,过滤后的悬浮液和未过滤的悬浮液之间没有差异。与未过滤的悬浮液相比,在过滤的悬浮液中肿瘤坏死因子α和白细胞介素8有小幅下降。结论:储存前白细胞减少,单采血液成分减少导致WBC减少数log10,对血小板生存力或功能无明显不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号