...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion medicine reviews >Blood Warming and Hemolysis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Blood Warming and Hemolysis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

机译:血液变暖和溶血:荟萃分析的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The use of fluid warmers during blood transfusion is recommended to avoid inducing hypothermia and its harmful effects. Fluid warmers offered by manufacturers can reach temperatures of 43 degrees C. However, the recommendations of national regulatory organizations do not clearly indicate the maximum heating temperature in relation to the risk of hemolysis. To fill this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. To match clinical practice, this review was limited to fluid warmers that used contact heating; thus, studies that used radiofrequency or microwave heating were excluded. Twenty-four observational studies were included, 17 of which were the subject of a meta-analysis. A preliminary descriptive analysis indicated that multiple factors can influence the level of hemolysis during blood heating with a liquid warmer, including blood age, anticoagulant type, duration of exposure to heat, stirring the blood during heating, and various elements of the circuit through which blood flows (eg, type of infusion pump with pressure and flow, type of microfilter, and type of tubing). Moreover, the duration between sampling and hemolysis assay was a source of heterogeneity among studies, as were the initial free hemoglobin levels in the various experiments. In general, the increase generated by each of these factors other than temperature appears to have been limited except for blood age, which is an important parameter of hemolysis, the length of exposure to heat, and, in some studies, the type of infusion pump used. Regarding the meta-analysis, at temperatures at or less than 43 degrees C and even up to 45-46 degrees C, it appears that blood heating is safe and causes hemolysis only in clinically negligible proportions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:建议在输血期间使用液体加热器,以避免引起体温过低及其有害影响。制造商提供的液体加热器可以达到43摄氏度的温度。但是,国家监管机构的建议并未明确指出与溶血风险相关的最高加热温度。为了填补这一空白,我们通过荟萃分析对文献进行了系统的综述。为了符合临床实践,本评价仅限于使用接触加热的液体加热器。因此,排除了使用射频或微波加热的研究。包括24项观察性研究,其中17项是荟萃分析的主题。初步的描述性分析表明,在使用液体加热器加热血液期间,多种因素会影响溶血水平,包括血液年龄,抗凝剂类型,暴露于热的时间,加热期间搅动血液以及血液通过回路的各种元素流量(例如具有压力和流量的输液泵类型,微过滤器类型以及管路类型)。此外,采样和溶血测定之间的持续时间是研究之间异质性的来源,各种实验中的初始游离血红蛋白水平也是如此。通常,除了温度以外,其他因素所产生的增加似乎都受到限制,除了血液年龄外,血液年龄是溶血的重要参数,受热的时间长短,在某些研究中还涉及输液泵的类型。用过的。关于荟萃分析,在低于或等于43摄氏度,甚至高达45-46摄氏度的温度下,看来血液加热是安全的,并且仅在临床上可忽略的比例下引起溶血。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号