...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion medicine reviews >Establishing causation in transfusion medicine and related tribulations.
【24h】

Establishing causation in transfusion medicine and related tribulations.

机译:在输血医学中建立因果关系及相关问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BOTH BLOOD BANKERS and clinicians practiced "faith-based" medicine for 5 decades (1940-2000) by transfusing red blood cells (RBCs) to patients with hemoglobin falling to less than or equal to 10 g/dL.' The Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) randomized controlled trial (RCT) then demonstrated that, without adverse outcomes, a transfusion trigger of 7 g/dL produced a result superior to a transfusion trigger of 10 g/dL.2 In fact, normovolemic intensive care unit (ICU) patients randomized to receive RBCs for a hemoglobin falling to less than or equal to 10 g/dL had a significant (P < .05) increase in the risk of myocardial infarction and pulmonary edema, as well as in-hospital mortality, compared with subjects randomized to receive allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) for a hemoglobin falling to less than or equal to 7 g/dL.
机译:血库和临床医生都通过将红细胞(RBC)输给血红蛋白含量低于或等于10 g / dL的患者,实践了“信仰型”药物长达5年(1940-2000年)。然后,《重症监护输血要求》(TRICC)随机对照试验(RCT)表明,在没有不良后果的情况下,输血触发7 g / dL产生的结果优于10 g / dL输血触发。2实际上,正血重症监护病房(ICU)患者因血红蛋白降至或小于10 g / dL而随机接受RBC治疗,其心肌梗塞和肺水肿的风险显着增加(P <.05),并且与随机接受异基因输血(ABT)的血红蛋白降至或小于7 g / dL的受试者相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号