首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion and apheresis science: official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis >ABO blood group discrepancies among blood donors in Regional Blood Transfusion Centre GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
【24h】

ABO blood group discrepancies among blood donors in Regional Blood Transfusion Centre GTB Hospital, Delhi, India

机译:印度德里地区输血中心GTB医院献血者中ABO血型差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Regional Blood Transfusion Centre (RBTC), GTB Hospital, Delhi is providing safe and quality blood to one third of Delhi population. A discrepancy exists when reactions in forward grouping do not match with reverse grouping or if the previous and current results do not match. Aim: To analyze ABO blood group discrepancies in an algorithmic manner, and to access the incidence and causes of ABO discrepancies among blood donors. Material and methods: Retrospective data of blood donors with blood group discrepancies was recorded in Regional Blood Transfusion Centre (East) Delhi, during a period of 3. years from January 2010 to May 2013. DiaMed-ID Card Micro Typing System using Gel Cards (Cressier sur Morat, Switzerland) were used for determination of the ABO/Rh blood groups combined with reverse grouping. A detailed serological workup of these cases was studied for recognition and resolution of the blood group discrepancy. Results: Total number of donors during the study period were 104,010 (30,120; 31,117; 32,173 and 10,600 respectively). Blood group discrepancies were found in 51 cases (0.04%). There were 30 (58.8%) cases with low avidity anti-B Antibodies, 10 (19.6%) cases with weaker expression or subgroups of A, 2 (3.9%) cases with weaker expression or subgroups of B, 5(9.8%) cases with unexpected alloantibodies (Anti-N and Anti-M, Anti-Lea) and one(1.9%) case of Bombay blood group.In 3 cases, discrepancy could not be resolved and were referred to reference laboratory for confirmation by molecular analysis. The most frequent cause of discrepancy in forward grouping was found to be weak A or B antigen expressions and in reverse grouping decreased anti-B titers was most common. Conclusion: All discrepancies reported on ABO cell and serum grouping must be investigated further, so that correct blood group is reported, minimizing the chances of transfusion reaction. A note of caution should be mentioned on the blood group card to prevent ABO incompatibility in case of transfusion.
机译:背景:德里GTB医院区域输血中心(RBTC)正在为三分之一的德里人口提供安全优质的血液。当正向分组中的反应与反向分组不匹配或先前结果与当前结果不匹配时,存在差异。目的:以算法方式分析ABO血型差异,并了解献血者中ABO血型差异的发生率和原因。材料和方法:从2010年1月至2013年5月的3年期间,在德里地区输血中心(东)记录了有血型差异的献血者的回顾性数据。DiaMed-ID卡使用凝胶卡的微型键入系统(瑞士的Cressier sur Morat用反向分组法确定了ABO / Rh血型。研究了这些病例的详细血清学检查,以识别和解决血型差异。结果:研究期间的捐赠者总数为104,010(分别为30,120、31,117、32,173和10,600)。血型差异51例(0.04%)。低亲和力抗B抗体30例(58.8%),表达较弱或A的亚​​组10例(19.6%),表达较弱或B的亚组2例(3.9%),5例(9.8%)伴有意料之外的同种抗体(抗N和抗M,抗Lea)和孟买血型的1例(1.9%)。3例中的差异无法解决,并转诊至参考实验室进行分子分析确认。发现在正向分组中最常见的差异原因是A或B抗原表达较弱,而在反向分组中,抗B效价下降是最常见的。结论:必须进一步调查所有关于ABO细胞和血清分组的差异,以便报告正确的血型,从而最大程度地减少输血反应的机会。血型卡上应注意注意事项,以防止输血时ABO不相容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号