...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of Royal Society of South Africa >Veterinary medicine and the lifeboat test: a perspective on the social relevance of the veterinary profession in the 21st century
【24h】

Veterinary medicine and the lifeboat test: a perspective on the social relevance of the veterinary profession in the 21st century

机译:兽医和救生艇测试:21世纪兽医行业的社会相关性透视

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past several decades, the veterinary profession in North America has become severely imbalanced and now serves society in a very lopsided way. What we do, we do very well. But what we do not do, or do too little, is a shameful disservice to society. What do veterinarians do? In North America in 2004, veterinarians do clinical practice, especially companion animal practice, and not much else. No detailed statistics on veterinary activity in Canada appear to exist, but Canadian statistics probably are very similar to those available for the United States. According to the American Veterinary Medical Association, in 2002, 90% of all veterinarians were in clinical practice, and 75% to 80% of practitioner time, or about 70% of total veterinary activity, was devoted to companion animals, mostly dogs, cats, and horses (American Veterinary Medical Association, 2003). This amount of companion animal practice is highly beneficial to North American society, and only just meets current market demand. At its best, companion animal practice is also the apex of veterinary scientific and technical clinical achievement. It is, and deserves to be, a source of pride to all veterinarians. But the proportion of total professional veterinary activity devoted to companion animals is skewed. This distortion of the veterinary profession is an alarming new development of the past few decades. It is a derangement that leaves society as a whole poorly served, with fundamental social issues, such as public health, food safety, food supply, and environmental security, unaddressed by the animal health specialists society has educated at great expense. This narrow application of veterinary expertise also jeopardizes the veterinary profession itself. It is an extreme position, with far too many eggs in one basket. It ransoms the profession to the commercial marketplace. It undermines the capacity of the profession to serve the public good in truly essential ways, and thereby it directs the profession toward social irrelevance.
机译:在过去的几十年中,北美的兽医行业已经严重失衡,现在以一种非常不平衡的方式为社会服务。我们做什么,我们做得很好。但是,我们不做或做得太少,是对社会的可耻损害。兽医做什么? 2004年在北美,兽医从事临床实践,尤其是伴侣动物实践,而没有其他活动。似乎没有加拿大有关兽医活动的详细统计信息,但加拿大的统计数据可能与美国的统计数据非常相似。根据美国兽医医学协会的数据,2002年,所有兽医中有90%从事临床工作,而从业人员的75%至80%的时间(约占总兽医活动的70%)专门用于陪伴动物,主要是狗,猫和马(美国兽医协会,2003年)。这种数量的陪伴动物做法对北美社会非常有益,并且仅能满足当前的市场需求。在最佳状态下,伴侣动物的实践也是兽医科学和技术临床成就的最高点。它是,而且应该成为所有兽医的骄傲之源。但是,专门用于陪伴动物的专业兽医活动的比例却存在偏差。兽医行业的这种扭曲是过去几十年来令人震惊的新发展。这种混乱使整个社会的服务水平低下,而根本的社会问题,例如公共卫生,食品安全,食品供应和环境安全,却没有得到动物卫生专家学会的巨大教育。兽医专业知识的这种狭义应用也危害了兽医专业本身。这是一个极端的位置,一个篮子里放了太多鸡蛋。赎金使该行业进入了商业市场。它破坏了该行业以真正必不可少的方式为公众服务的能力,从而使该行业转向与社会无关的事物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号