首页> 外文期刊>Toxicology in vitro: an international journal published in association with BIBRA >A prevalidation study on the in vitro skin irritation function test (SIFT) for prediction of acute skin irritation in vivo: results and evaluation of ECVAM Phase III.
【24h】

A prevalidation study on the in vitro skin irritation function test (SIFT) for prediction of acute skin irritation in vivo: results and evaluation of ECVAM Phase III.

机译:体外皮肤刺激功能测试(SIFT)预测体内急性皮肤刺激的预验证研究:ECVAM III期的结果和评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A prevalidation study sponsored by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation is aimed at identifying non-animal tests capable of discriminating irritants (I) from non-irritants (NI), as defined according to European Union and OECD. This paper reports on Phase III for one of the methods, the skin integrity function test (SIFT), assessing the protocol performance of the SIFT, in terms of reproducibility and predictive ability, in three laboratories. The barrier function properties of excised mouse skin were determined using a set of 20 coded chemicals (10 I, 10 NI), using the endpoints of trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and electrical resistance (ER). The basis of the SIFT prediction model is if the ratios of the pre- and post-application values for either TEWL or ER are greater than five-fold, then the test chemical is deemed irritant (I). If the ratio of both parameters is less than five-fold then the chemical is deemed non-irritant (NI). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the intra-lab reproducibility was acceptable but that the inter-lab reproducibility was not. Overall, the SIFT test under-predicted the irritancy of the test chemicals chosen for Phase III with an overall accuracy of only 55%. The sensitivity value (ability to correctly predict I) was only 30%. The specificity (ability to predict NI) of the test was better at 80%. A retrospective examination of the SIFT results was undertaken using Student's t-test and a significance level of P<0.05 to predict an irritant based on changes in the TEWL ratio values. This improved the predictivity of the SIFT test, giving a specificity of 60%, a sensitivity of 80% and an overall accuracy of 70%. Appropriate modifications to the prediction model have now been made and the SIFT will be re-examined in a new validation exercise to investigate the potential of this non-animal method to predict acute skin irritation potential.
机译:由欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)赞助的一项针对急性皮肤刺激的体外测试的预验证研究旨在确定能够区分刺激性(I)和非刺激性(NI)的非动物测试根据欧盟和经合组织的说法。本文报告了其中一种方法的阶段III,即皮肤完整性功能测试(SIFT),它在三个实验室中就可再现性和预测能力方面评估了SIFT的方案性能。使用一组20种编码化学品(10 I,10 NI),使用经表皮水分损失(TEWL)和电阻(ER)的终点,确定了切除的小鼠皮肤的屏障功能特性。 SIFT预测模型的基础是,如果TEWL或ER的应用前后值之比大于5倍,则认为该测试化学品具有刺激性(I)。如果两个参数的比率均小于五倍,则该化学药品被视为无刺激性(NI)。方差分析(ANOVA)表明实验室内部的可重复性是可以接受的,但实验室之间的可重复性是不可接受的。总体而言,SIFT测试低估了为第三阶段选择的测试化学品的刺激性,其总准确度仅为55%。灵敏度值(正确预测I的能力)仅为30%。测试的特异性(预测NI的能力)更好,为80%。使用Student's t检验和P <0.05的显着性水平对SIFT结果进行回顾性检查,以根据TEWL比值的变化预测刺激物。这提高了SIFT测试的可预测性,特异性为60%,灵敏度为80%,总准确度为70%。现在已经对预测模型进行了适当的修改,并将在一项新的验证活动中重新检查SIFT,以研究这种非动物方法预测急性皮肤刺激性的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号