首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals >Improving Inner Quality in Continuous Casting Rectangular Billets: Comparison Between Mechanical Soft Reduction and Final Electromagnetic Stirring
【24h】

Improving Inner Quality in Continuous Casting Rectangular Billets: Comparison Between Mechanical Soft Reduction and Final Electromagnetic Stirring

机译:改善连铸矩形坯的内部质量:机械软压下和最终电磁搅拌的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The comparison between the mechanical soft reduction (MSR) and final electromagnetic stirring (FEMS) on center carbon macrosegregation and v-segregation has been investigated in order to improve the inner quality of high carbon 82A steel with a section of size 180 mm x 240 mm. A heat transfer calculation model by using C++ programming language is developed and applied to calculate the appropriate casting speed of continuous casting during the FEMS and MSR processes. The calculated action zone of FEMS and MSR is at the location with a solid fraction of 0.28-0.41 and 0.30-0.90, respectively. The industrial results show that the effects of MSR in improving the center carbon segregation, reducing the shrinkage cavity and suppressing the V-segregation are more effective than FEMS. The mean center carbon segregation degree reduces from 1.19 to 1.15 with FEMS and decreases from 1.19 to 1.07 with MSR. Besides, compared with FEMS, MSR can eliminate shrinkage cavity and V-segregation but may generate center negative segregation and transverse cracks subjected to reduction pressure.
机译:为了改善截面尺寸为180 mm x 240 mm的高碳82A钢的内部质量,对机械软压下(MSR)和最终电磁搅拌(FEMS)在中心碳宏观偏析和v偏析方面的比较进行了研究。 。开发了一种使用C ++编程语言的传热计算模型,并将其应用于在FEMS和MSR过程中计算适当的连铸速度。 FEMS和MSR的计算出的作用区域分别位于固体分数为0.28-0.41和0.30-0.90的位置。工业结果表明,MSR在改善中心碳偏析,减少收缩腔和抑制V偏析方面比FEMS更有效。 FEMS的平均中心碳偏析度从1.19降低到1.15,MSR的平均中心碳偏析度从1.19降低到1.07。此外,与FEMS相比,MSR可以消除收缩腔和V偏析,但在减压条件下可能会产生中心负偏析和横向裂纹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号