...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Research: An International Journal on Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis >Validation of a score for predicting fatal bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism
【24h】

Validation of a score for predicting fatal bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism

机译:接受静脉血栓栓塞抗凝治疗的致命性出血预测得分的验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background The only available score to assess the risk for fatal bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been validated yet. Methods We used the RIETE database to validate the risk-score for fatal bleeding within the first 3 months of anticoagulation in a new cohort of patients recruited after the end of the former study. Accuracy was measured using the ROC curve analysis. Results As of December 2011, 39,284 patients were recruited in RIETE. Of these, 15,206 had not been included in the former study, and were considered to validate the score. Within the first 3 months of anticoagulation, 52 patients (0.34%; 95% CI: 0.27-0.45) died of bleeding. Patients with a risk score of < 1.5 points (64.1% of the cohort) had a 0.10% rate of fatal bleeding, those with a score of 1.5-4.0 (33.6%) a rate of 0.72%, and those with a score of > 4 points had a rate of 1.44%. The c-statistic for fatal bleeding was 0.775 (95% CI 0.720-0.830). The score performed better for predicting gastrointestinal (c-statistic, 0.869; 95% CI: 0.810-0.928) than intracranial (c-statistic, 0.687; 95% CI: 0.568-0.806) fatal bleeding. The score value with highest combined sensitivity and specificity was 1.75. The risk for fatal bleeding was significantly increased (odds ratio: 7.6; 95% CI 3.7-16.2) above this cut-off value. Conclusions The accuracy of the score in this validation cohort was similar to the accuracy found in the index study. Interestingly, it performed better for predicting gastrointestinal than intracranial fatal bleeding.
机译:背景技术唯一可用于评估静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者致命出血风险的分数尚未得到验证。方法我们使用RIETE数据库验证了先前研究结束后招募的新患者在抗凝治疗的前三个月内发生致命性出血的风险评分。使用ROC曲线分析测量准确性。结果截至2011年12月,RIETE招募了39284名患者。其中,有15206条未纳入先前的研究,因此被认为可以验证分数。在抗凝治疗的前3个月内,有52例患者(0.34%; 95%CI:0.27-0.45)死于出血。危险评分<1.5分(占队列的64.1%)的患者致命出血率为0.10%,危险评分为1.5-4.0(33.6%)的患者为0.72%, 4分的比率为1.44%。致命性出血的c统计量为0.775(95%CI 0.720-0.830)。预测胃肠道出血(c统计,0.869; 95%CI:0.810-0.928)比颅内(c统计,0.687; 95%CI:0.568-0.806)更好。综合敏感性和特异性最高的得分为1.75。高于该临界值,致命出血的风险显着增加(赔率:7.6; 95%CI 3.7-16.2)。结论在该验证队列中,分数的准确性与在索引研究中发现的准确性相似。有趣的是,它在预测胃肠道方面比颅内致命出血表现更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号