首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Research: An International Journal on Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis >Variability of INR and its relationship with mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisations in patients with atrial fibrillation
【24h】

Variability of INR and its relationship with mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisations in patients with atrial fibrillation

机译:心房纤颤患者INR的变化及其与死亡率,中风,出血和住院的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background - rationale for study: Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and mortality which is reduced by treatment with Warfarin. The most commonly used tool to assess the effectiveness of warfarin therapy is the time in therapeutic Range (TTR) of International Normalised Ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0. Our aim was to study whether INR variability, as assessed by the standard deviation of transformed INR (SDT INR) is more prognostically important than the TTR. Methods and Results: We studied 19,180 patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin therapy to evaluate the association of TTR and that of SDT INR with all-cause mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisation. The SDT INR was more prognostically important than the TTR. One standard deviation (SD) higher of SDT INR had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.59 (95% CI 1.52-1.66) of mortality compared with 1.18 (95% CI 1.13-1.24) for one SD lower of TTR. For the other 3 events the HR was also higher for the SDT INR than for the TTR (stroke 1.30 (95% CI 1.22-1.39) vs. 1.06 (95% CI 1.00-1.13), bleeding 1.27 (95% CI 1.20-1.35) vs. 1.07 (95% CI 1.01-1.14), hospitalisation 1.47 (95% CI 1.45-1.49) vs. 1.13 (95% CI 1.10-1.15). When both metrics were included in the same analysis only the SDT INR was of significant predictive value. Conclusions: The SDT INR is a better predictor of mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisation than the TTR in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin therapy.
机译:背景-研究理由:房颤与中风和死亡的风险增加相关,而华法林治疗可降低这种风险。评估华法林治疗效果的最常用工具是国际标准化比率(INR)为2.0-3.0的治疗时间(TTR)。我们的目的是研究以转化INR(SDT INR)的标准差(SDT INR)评估的INR变异性是否比TTR在预后上更重要。方法和结果:我们研究了19180例华法林治疗的房颤患者,以评估TTR和SDT INR与全因死亡率,中风,出血和住院的相关性。 SDT INR在预后上比TTR更重要。 SDT INR升高1个标准差(SD)时,死亡率的危险比(HR)为1.59(95%CI 1.52-1.66),而TTR降低1个SD时的危险度(HR)为1.18(95%CI 1.13-1.24)。对于其他3个事件,SDT INR的心率也高于TTR(中风1.30(95%CI 1.22-1.39)vs. 1.06(95%CI 1.00-1.13),出血为1.27(95%CI 1.20-1.35) )vs. 1.07(95%CI 1.01-1.14),住院1.47(95%CI 1.45-1.49)和1.13(95%CI 1.10-1.15)。当两个指标都包含在同一分析中时,仅SDT INR为结论:与华法林治疗的房颤患者相比,SDT INR比TTR更好地预测死亡率,中风,出血和住院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号