...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis >Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin A propensity score matched analysis
【24h】

Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin A propensity score matched analysis

机译:在阿哌沙班,达比加群,利伐沙班或华法林引发的非瓣膜性房颤患者中主要出血风险的真实世界比较A倾向评分匹配分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In addition to warfarin, there are four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) available for stroke prevention in non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There are limited data on the comparative risks of major bleeding among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients who initiate warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban, when used in 'real world' clinical practice. The study used the Truven MarketScan (R) Commercial & Medicare supplemental US claims database. NVAF patients aged >= 18 years newly prescribed an oral anticoagulant 01JAN2013-31DEC2014, with a >= 1-year baseline period, were included (study period: 01JAN2012-31DEC2014). Major bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring hospitalisation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance age, sex, region, baseline comorbidities, and comedications. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the PSM hazard ratio (HR) of major bleeding. Among 45,361 newly anticoagulated NVAF patients, 15,461 (34.1 %) initiated warfarin, 7,438 (16.4 %) initiated apixaban, 17,801 (39.2 %) initiated rivaroxaban, and 4,661 (10.3 %) initiated dabigatran. Compared to matched warfarin initiators, apixaban (HR: 0.53; 95 % CI: 0.39-0.71) and dabigatran (HR: 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.50-0.96) initiators had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding. Patients initiating rivaroxaban (HR: 0.98; 95 % CI: 0.83-1.17) had a non-significant difference in major bleeding risk compared to matched warfarin patients. When comparisons were made between NOACs, matched rivaroxaban patients had a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (HR: 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.36-2.43) compared to apixaban patients. The differences for apixaban- dabigatran and dabigatran-rivaroxaban matched cohorts were not statistically significant. Among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients in the real-world setting, apixaban and dabigatran initiation was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin initiation. When compared to apixaban, rivaroxaban initiation was associated with significantly higher risk of major bleeding.
机译:除华法令外,还有四种非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)可用于非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)的中风预防。在刚开始用于“现实世界”临床实践中的华法林,阿哌沙班,达比加群或利伐沙班的新抗凝NVAF患者中,有关重大出血的相对风险的数据有限。该研究使用了Truven MarketScan(R)Commercial&Medicare美国补充索赔数据库。包括年龄大于等于18岁的NVAF患者,他们新开了口服抗凝剂01JAN2013-31DEC2014,基线期大于等于1年(研究期:01JAN2012-31DEC2014)。大出血定义为需要住院的出血。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于平衡年龄,性别,区域,基线合并症和喜剧。使用Cox比例风险模型估算大出血的PSM风险比(HR)。在45,361名新的抗凝NVAF患者中,有15,461(34.1%)发起了华法林,7,438(16.4%)发起了阿哌沙班,17,801(39.2%)发起了利伐沙班和4,661(10.3%)发起了达比加群。与匹配的华法林引发剂相比,阿哌沙班(HR:0.53; 95%CI:0.39-0.71)和达比加群(HR:0.69; 95%CI:0.50-0.96)引发剂的大出血风险显着降低。与匹配的华法林患者相比,开始使用利伐沙班的患者(HR:0.98; 95%CI:0.83-1.17)在主要出血风险上无显着差异。在NOAC之间进行比较时,相匹配的利伐沙班患者比阿哌沙班患者有更大的大出血风险(HR:1.82; 95%CI:1.36-2.43)。阿哌沙班-达比加群和达比加群-利伐沙班匹配组的差异无统计学意义。在实际情况中,在新近抗凝的NVAF患者中,与华法林治疗相比,阿哌沙班和达比加群治疗与大出血风险显着降低相关。与阿哌沙班相比,利伐沙班的启动与大出血风险明显升高有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号