首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Bleeding risk of apixaban, dabigatran, and low-dose rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched analysis of administrative claims data
【24h】

Bleeding risk of apixaban, dabigatran, and low-dose rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a propensity matched analysis of administrative claims data

机译:与日本非瓣膜心房颤动的日本患者的华法林相比,Apixaban,Dabigatran和低剂量Rivaroxaban的出血风险:行政权利要求的倾向匹配分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: There is scarce evidence comparing novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in real-world settings in Japan. This study compared the risk of bleeding events among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating treatment with NOACs versus warfarin.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a de-identified electronic health record based database of health claims and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from 275 consenting hospitals in Japan. NVAF patients newly initiated on oral anticoagulants were eligible. Based on the first prescription, patients were assigned to 5/2.5mg BID apixaban, 150/110mg BID dabigatran, 15/10mg QD rivaroxaban (approved dose lower in Japan compared to Western countries [20/15mg QD]) or warfarin groups. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient characteristics between warfarin and each NOAC. Patients were followed up to 1 year post-first prescription.Results: Among 38,662 eligible patients, a total of 5977, 5090, and 6726 matched pairs were identified for warfarin versus apixaban, warfarin versus dabigatran, and warfarin versus rivaroxaban, respectively after PSM. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (hazard ratio [HR] 0.586; 95% CI 0.421-0.815), dabigatran (HR 0.617; 0.425-0.895) and rivaroxaban (HR 0.693; 0.514-0.933) were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding. The risk of any bleeding was significantly lower for apixaban (HR 0.782; 0.682-0.896), but not for dabigatran (HR 0.988; 0.860-1.135) or rivaroxaban (HR 0.938; 0.832-1.057) when comparing to warfarin.Conclusions: Among Japanese patients with NVAF, treatment with apixaban 5/2.5mg BID was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding and any bleeding when compared to warfarin. Treatment with dabigatran 150/110mg BID or rivaroxaban 15/10mg QD was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding, but not any bleeding, than warfarin. The potential benefit of individual NOACs in real-world practice needs to be assessed further.
机译:目的:在日本现实世界环境中将新的口腔抗凝血剂(NOAC)与华法林进行比较,有稀缺的证据。该研究比较了非瓣膜心房颤动患者(NVAF)的出血事件的风险与Noacs对诺法含量的影响。方法:使用基于识别的电子健康记录的健康索赔和诊断程序进行了回顾性队列研究来自日本的275家同意医院的组合数据。 NVAF患者新发起的口服抗凝血剂有资格。基于第一个处方,患者分配到5 / 2.5mgZIDαAbixaban,150 / 110mg BID Dabigatran,15 / 10mg QD Rivaroxaban(与西方国家相比,日本批准的剂量降低[20 / 15mg QD])或华法林组。一对一的倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于平衡华法林和每个诺卡克之间的患者特征。患者的首次任期优先于1年。结果:38,662名符合条件的患者,共有5977,5090和6726个匹配对,用于Warfarin与Apixaban,Warfarin与Dabigatran和Warfarin与Rivaroxaban相比,分别在PSM之后。与华法林,Apixaban(危险比[HR] 0.586; 95%CI 0.421-0.815),Dabigatran(HR 0.617; 0.425-0.895)和蓖麻毒草(HR 0.693; 0.514-0.933)与主要出血的风险显着降低。 APIXABAN(HR 0.782; 0.682-0.896)的任何出血的风险显着降低,但不适用于Dabigatran(HR 0.988; 0.860-1.135)或Rivaroxaban(HR 0.938; 0.832-1.057)与Warfarin.Conclusions:在日语中NVAF的患者,用紫杉醇治疗5 / 2.5mg培育与旱法相比,具有显着降低的重大出血风险和任何出血。用Dabigatran的处理150 / 110mg或rivaroxaban 15 / 10mg QD与大量出血的风险显着降低,而不是任何出血,而不是华法林。需要进一步评估个人诺克斯在现实惯例中的潜在利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号