...
首页> 外文期刊>The regulatory affairs journal: Pharma >The ECJ's Ruling in the Genetics Case: A Muddying of the Waters on the Interaction between the Basic Pharmaceutical Legislation and the SPC Regulation?
【24h】

The ECJ's Ruling in the Genetics Case: A Muddying of the Waters on the Interaction between the Basic Pharmaceutical Legislation and the SPC Regulation?

机译:欧洲法院在遗传学案件中的裁决:对基本药物立法与SPC法规之间的相互作用感到困惑吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The strict application by the European Court of Justice of the law on generic approvals in the case of Generics (UK) Ltd v The Licensing Authority (acting via the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) is a victory for the innovative pharmaceutical industry. Following the ECJ's ruling, a product that was initially granted a marketing authorisation under national rules which was never updated to meet current Community legislative requirements cannot be used as a "reference medicinal product" for the''approval of a generic version containing the same active substance.The ECJ's decision, rendered on 18 June, is not surprising. It raises, however, an interesting question as to the interaction between the basic European pharmaceutical legislation, namely Directive 2001/83 (as amended), and Council Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products.
机译:对于Generics(UK)Ltd诉Licensing Authority(通过药品和保健产品监管局代理)一案,欧洲法院严格适用仿制药批准法律,是创新制药业的胜利。根据欧洲法院的裁决,最初根据国家法规获得市场许可的产品,其从未更新过以符合当前的共同体立法要求,因此,不得将其用作“批准包含相同活性成分的仿制药的参考药品”。欧洲法院于6月18日作出的决定并不令人惊讶。但是,这引起了一个有趣的问题,即基本的欧洲药品立法(即第2001/83号指令(已修订))与理事会条例(EEC)第1768/92号有关建立药品补充保护证书的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号