首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Unexpected overestimation of methotrexate plasma concentrations: Analysis of a single center pediatric population
【24h】

Unexpected overestimation of methotrexate plasma concentrations: Analysis of a single center pediatric population

机译:甲氨蝶呤血浆浓度的意外高估:单个中心儿科人群的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: At this center, therapeutic drug monitoring of methotrexate (MTX) used to be performed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). We observed an increasing number of unusual high MTX concentrations at 48 and 72 hours during a couple of years. This study aimed to identify the causes of this variation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 272 patients hospitalized between January 2008 and October 2012. The whole MTX use system was analyzed using Ishikawa's method. The proportion of MTX concentrations ≤0.2 μmole/L at 48 (P48h) and 72 hours (P72h) was recorded and compared between both FPIA and EMITSiemens assays. A χ2 or a Fisher exact test was used (α = 0.05). Results: Because of an announced withdrawal of the FPIA reagent, the method was switched in 2009 to an immunoenzymatic technique (EMITSiemens). Both P48h and P72h dropped significantly after 2009 (P48h: 45% versus 5% and P72h: 91% versus 47%; P 0.0001). The replacement of the EMITSiemens reagent by the EMITARK Diagnostics reagent in 2012 led to an increase in both P48h and P72h. No significant difference was found in the proportions of MTX ≤0.2 μmole/L concentrations between FPIA and EMITARK Diagnostics at 48 (45% and 40%; P = 0.556) and 72 hours (91% and 100%; P = 0.231). Both internal and external quality control assessments gave regular satisfactory results during the study period. Furthermore, the interassay comparisons that were performed with internal quality controls and spiked serum samples showed similar results at the time of both shifts. The other changes observed in the MTX circuit were not associated with MTX concentration variations. CONCLUSIONS:: The overestimation of the plasma concentration of MTX was concluded to be because of the assay reagent. A further study is consequently necessary to assess the impact of this analytical pitfall on the patients' survival.
机译:背景:在该中心,甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的治疗药物监测过去通常通过荧光偏振免疫测定(FPIA)进行。在几年中的48和72小时,我们观察到越来越多的异常高MTX浓度。这项研究旨在确定这种差异的原因。方法:对2008年1月至2012年10月期间住院的272例患者进行回顾性分析。采用Ishikawa方法对整个MTX使用系统进行了分析。记录48(P48h)和72小时(P72h)时MTX浓度≤0.2μmol/ L的比例,并在FPIA和EMITSiemens分析之间进行比较。使用χ2或Fisher精确检验(α= 0.05)。结果:由于宣布退出FPIA试剂,该方法于2009年转换为免疫酶技术(EMITSiemens)。 2009年之后,P48h和P72h均显着下降(P48h:45%对5%,P72h:91%对47%; P <0.0001)。 2012年用EMITARK Diagnostics试剂代替EMITSiemens试剂导致P48h和P72h均增加。 FPIA和EMITARK Diagnostics在48(45%和40%; P = 0.556)和72小时(91%和100%; P = 0.231)时,MTX≤0.2μmol/ L浓度的比例没有显着差异。在研究期间,内部和外部质量控制评估均给出了令人满意的定期结果。此外,使用内部质量控制和加标血清样品进行的批间比较在两次转换时均显示出相似的结果。在MTX回路中观察到的其他变化与MTX浓度变化无关。结论:MTX血浆浓度的高估被认为是由于测定试剂的缘故。因此,有必要进行进一步的研究,以评估这种分析性陷阱对患者生存的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号