首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Developing an assay for ceftazidime: is it worth the effort?
【24h】

Developing an assay for ceftazidime: is it worth the effort?

机译:开发一种头孢他啶的测定方法:值得努力吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With interest I have read the article of Aubert and colleagues on the prospective determination of serum ceftazi-dime (CAZ) concentrations in intensive care units (ICUs). The authors conclude their article by stating that CAZ measurement is needed in ICUs to achieve adequate CAZ concentrations to reach optimal efficacy and minimal toxicity. I agree with the authors that in an ideal world, it would be great to have an opportunity to optimize our treatment by measuring the concentration of a drag used if there is a clear relationship between the pharmacokinetics and phar-macodynamics of the drug as clearly is the case in the treatment of many infectious diseases. However, in the case of CAZ, an antibacterial agent purely cleared by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the question arises whether it would have been much easier to measure GFR than to measure CAZ.
机译:感兴趣的是,我阅读了Aubert及其同事关于前瞻性确定重症监护病房(ICU)中血清头孢他啶二甲(CAZ)浓度的文章。作者在文章的结尾指出,在ICU中需要进行CAZ测量,以达到足够的CAZ浓度,以达到最佳疗效和最小毒性。我同意作者的观点,在理想的世界中,如果药物的药代动力学和药效动力学之间存在明确的关系,那么有机会通过测量所用药物的浓度来优化我们的治疗方法将是非常好的。在许多传染病的治疗情况下。然而,对于CAZ(一种仅通过肾小球滤过率(GFR)清除的抗菌剂),就产生了一个问题,即测量GFR是否比测量CAZ容易得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号