首页> 外文期刊>The South African Archaeological Bulletin >ETHNICITY AND ETHICAL ISSUES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION: THE CASE OF CHAKELUKA IRON AGE SITE, LUSAKA, ZAMBIA
【24h】

ETHNICITY AND ETHICAL ISSUES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION: THE CASE OF CHAKELUKA IRON AGE SITE, LUSAKA, ZAMBIA

机译:考古解释中的民族与伦理问题:以赞比亚卢萨卡查克卢卡铁矿时代遗址为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Chakeluka Heritage site in Lusaka, Zambia, has been controversial since its excavation in the late 1960s. It has been a source of tension between ethnic groups living around the site and the National Heritage Conservation Commission, the body mandated by government to protect and manage heritage resources in Zambia. This paper discusses the history of this tension, the problems of misinformation and the legacy of a lack of public awareness about the meaning and significance of heritage to national development. At the centre of the controversy are two human burials recovered during the 1968 excavations. These burials reinforced local interpretations that Chakeluka is an ancestral burial ground and that it should be treated as such. Archaeological excavations in 1968 and recently in 2009 suggest otherwise. The material evidence is that of an Iron Age settlement that was occupied from the closing stages of the first millennium AD up to the 19 th century by communities practising an agricultural lifestyle and with a knowledge of iron working.
机译:自1960年代后期发掘以来,位于赞比亚卢萨卡的Chakeluka Heritage遗址一直备受争议。这一直是居住在该遗址附近的种族群体与国家遗产保护委员会之间紧张关系的源头,该委员会是政府授权的机构,负责保护和管理赞比亚的遗产资源。本文讨论了这种紧张局势的历史,错误信息的问题以及公众对遗产对国家发展的意义和重要性缺乏认识的后果。争议的中心是在1968年的发掘中发现的两个人类墓葬。这些墓葬强化了当地对Chakeluka是祖先墓地的理解,应该将其视为祖先。 1968年和2009年的考古发掘则相反。物质证据表明,铁器时代的一个定居点被从公元第一千年的末期到19世纪,由从事农业生活方式和了解铁加工知识的社区占领。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号