Ambiguity and confusion seems to lie in current leadership

The Pharmaceutical Journal Group

首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Ambiguity and confusion seems to lie in current leadership

【24h】

Ambiguity and confusion seems to lie in current leadership

机译：目前的领导层似乎存在歧义和困惑

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Members' legitimate concerns about the proposed new Charter deserve more considered responses from both the President and the Secretary and Registraar than those published The Journal of 1 November (p603 and p614).

机译：与11月1日的《日刊》（p603和p614）相比，会员们对拟议的新《宪章》的合理关切应得到总统，秘书和书记官长的更多考虑。

著录项

来源
《The pharmaceutical journal》 |2003年第7275期|共1页
作者
The Pharmaceutical Journal Group;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类药学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Ambiguity and confusion seems to lie in current leadership [J] . The Pharmaceutical Journal Group The pharmaceutical journal . 2003,第7275期

机译：目前的领导层似乎存在歧义和困惑
2. Is avoidant leadership a root cause of subordinate stress? Longitudinal relationships between laissez-faire leadership and role ambiguity [J] . Anders Skogstad, Jorn Hetland, Lars Glaso, Work & Stress . 2014,第4期

机译：回避型领导是否是从属压力的根本原因？自由放任的领导与角色模糊之间的纵向关系
3. Leadership and Uncertainty: How Role Ambiguity Affects the Relationship between Leader Group Prototypicality and Leadership Effectiveness [J] . Lavinia Cicero, Antonio Pierro, Daan van Knippenberg British Journal of Management . 2010,第2期

机译：领导力和不确定性：角色歧义性如何影响领导者团队原型和领导力有效性之间的关系
4. Confusion Weighted Loss for Ambiguous Classification [C] . Yu Lei, Yuan Dong, Fengye Xiong, IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference . 2018

机译：模糊分类的混淆加权损失
5. Boundary ambiguity, contact consistency and role confusion in complex stepfamily households [D] . Mirshak, Aida 1993

机译：复杂继婚家庭的边界模糊性，接触一致性和角色混淆
6. Majority Decision-Making Works Best Under Conditions of Leadership Ambiguity and Shared Task Representations [O] . Michaéla C. Schippers, Diana C. Rus 2021

机译：在领导歧义和共享任务表示的条件下多数决策效果最佳
7. British Letters Patent of 1908 and 1917 constituting the Falkland Islands Dependencies The following are the texts of the two Letters Patent denning the boundaries of the Falkland Islands Dependencies. They are reprinted here in view of the current political interest in this area. Some confusion has arisen owing to misrepresentation of the wording of these documents. The Letters Patent of 1908 made provision for the government of certain specified land areas lying between specified latitudes and longitudes. No claim was made to jurisdiction over the High Seas within these boundaries; still less was any claim made to that part of South America which lies to the south of latitude 50° S. The Letters Patent of 1917 denned the area more precisely in order to avoid this ambiguity. All subsequent British legislation for the administration of these Dependencies is based on the authority of these two documents. [O] . 1948

机译：英国信件1908年和1917年构成福克兰群岛的依赖性以下是谴责福克兰群岛依赖性的边界的两封信的文本。鉴于目前对该领域的政治兴趣，他们在此转载。由于这些文件的措辞歪曲了一些混乱。 1908年的信件专利为某些指定土地区域的政府提供了符合特定纬度和纵向的政府。在这些界限内没有索赔对公海的司法管辖区;仍然仍然是对南美洲的那部分索利的任何索赔，这些南美侧向纬度为50°S南部。1917年的字母专利更准确地击落了该地区，以避免这种歧义。所有后续英国人的管理这些依赖项的立法是基于这两份文件的权威。

Ambiguity and confusion seems to lie in current leadership

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅