...
首页> 外文期刊>The Royal Society Proceedings B: Biological Sciences >Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding: the role of ecology and life history re-examined
【24h】

Towards a unified theory of cooperative breeding: the role of ecology and life history re-examined

机译:建立统一的合作育种理论:重新审视生态和生活史的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We present quantitative models that unify several adaptive hypotheses for the evolution of cooperative breeding in a single framework: the ecological constraints hypothesis, the life-history hypothesis and the benefits-of-philopatry hypothesis. Our goal is to explain interspecific variation in the occurrence of cooperative breeding in terms of interspecific variation in life-history traits and ecological conditions. We analyse two models, according to whether or not helpers can inherit their parents' territory. Major results are (i) territory inheritance always promotes cooperative breeding; (ii) if territories are not inherited, neither ecological constraints nor variation in life-history traits predict interspecific variation in cooperative breeding; and (iii) if territories are inherited, the mechanism of density regulation is crucial in determining which factors promote cooperative breeding. If density dependence acts on the probability to obtain a free territory or on the survival of dispersers, variation in ecological constraints cannot explain variation in cooperative breeding. Lower adult mortality favours helping, not because it reduces the availability of free territories, but because it enhances the direct benefits of helpers. If density dependence acts on fecundity, lower probability of obtaining a free territory and lower survival of dispersers promote cooperative breeding. In this case, lower adult mortality works against the evolution of helping. We suggest that the difference between birds and social insects in the covariance between cooperative breeding and life-history traits is due to different mechanisms of density regulation that operate in these taxa, and we explain how natural selection on habitat choice might have caused these different mechanisms to operate. [References: 38]
机译:我们提出了定量模型,该模型统一了在一个单一框架内合作育种进化的几个适应性假设:生态约束假设,生命历史假设和慈善收益假设。我们的目标是根据生活史特征和生态条件的种间差异来解释合作育种中的种间差异。我们根据佣工是否可以继承父母的领土来分析两个模型。主要结果是:(i)领土继承总是促进合作育种; (ii)如果不继承领土,则生态约束和生活史特征的变化都不能预测合作育种的种间变化; (iii)如果领土被继承,则密度调节机制对于确定哪些因素促进合作繁殖至关重要。如果密度依赖于获得自由区域的可能性或分散器的生存,生态约束的变化就不能解释合作育种的变化。降低成年人死亡率有利于提供帮助,不是因为它减少了自由领土的可利用性,而是因为它增加了帮助者的直接利益。如果密度依赖于繁殖力,获得自由区域的可能性较低,而分散器的存活率较低,则会促进合作育种。在这种情况下,较低的成年人死亡率不利于帮助的发展。我们认为,鸟类和社交昆虫之间在合作繁殖和生活史特征之间的协方差方面的差异是由于这些类群中不同的密度调节机制所致,并且我们解释了对栖息地选择的自然选择如何可能导致了这些不同的机制操作。 [参考:38]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号