首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Basic processes in reading aloud and colour naming: Towards a better understanding of the role of spatial attention
【24h】

Basic processes in reading aloud and colour naming: Towards a better understanding of the role of spatial attention

机译:朗读和命名的基本过程:更好地理解空间注意力的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Whether or not lexical access from print requires spatial attention has been debated intensively for the last 30 years. Studies involving colour naming generally find evidence that "unattended" words are processed. In contrast, reading-based experiments do not find evidence of distractor processing. One theory ascribes the discrepancy to weaker attentional demands for colour identification. If colour naming does not capture all of a subject's attention, the remaining attentional resources can be deployed to process the distractor word. The present study combined exogenous spatial cueing with colour naming and reading aloud separately and found that colour naming is less sensitive to the validity of a spatial cue than is reading words aloud. Based on these results, we argue that colour naming studies do not effectively control attention so that no conclusions about unattended distractor processing can be drawn from them. Thus we reiterate the consistent conclusion drawn from reading aloud and lexical decision studies: There is no word identification without (spatial) attention.
机译:在过去30年中,关于从印刷品进行词汇检索是否需要空间关注的争论一直很激烈。涉及颜色命名的研究通常会找到“无人看管”字词被处理的证据。相比之下,基于阅读的实验没有发现干扰因素的证据。一种理论将差异归因于对颜色识别的注意力要求较弱。如果颜色命名不能吸引所有主题的注意力,则可以将其余的注意力资源用于处理干扰词。本研究将外源空间提示与颜色命名相结合,并分别大声朗读,发现颜色命名对空间提示有效性的敏感性不如大声朗读单词。根据这些结果,我们认为颜色命名研究不能有效地控制注意力,因此无法从中得出有关无人看管的干扰处理的结论。因此,我们重申从朗读和词汇决策研究中得出的一致结论:没有(空间)注意就没有单词识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号