...
首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality
【24h】

The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality

机译:语言和认知因素对基于动词的隐含因果关系时程的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In three eye-tracking experiments the influence of the Dutch causal connective "want" (because) and the working memory capacity of readers on the usage of verb-based implicit causality was examined. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that although a causal connective is not required to activate implicit causality information during reading, effects of implicit causality surfaced more rapidly and were more pronounced when a connective was present in the discourse than when it was absent. In addition, Experiment 3 revealed that-in contrast to previous claims-the activation of implicit causality is not a resource-consuming mental operation. Moreover, readers with higher and lower working memory capacities behaved differently in a dual-task situation. Higher span readers were more likely to use implicit causality when they had all their working memory resources at their disposal. Lower span readers showed the opposite pattern as they were more likely to use the implicit causality cue in the case of an additional working memory load. The results emphasize that both linguistic and cognitive factors mediate the impact of implicit causality on text comprehension. The implications of these results are discussed in terms of the ongoing controversies in the literature-that is, the focusing-integration debate and the debates on the source of implicit causality.
机译:在三个眼动实验中,研究了荷兰因果联系词“想要”(因为)的影响以及读者的工作记忆能力对基于动词的隐式因果关系的使用。实验1和2表明,尽管在阅读过程中不需要因果联系词来激活隐式因果关系信息,但是当话语中存在连接词时,隐性因果关系的影响更加迅速地显现出来,并且比不存在隐式因果关系时更为明显。此外,实验3显示,与以前的主张相反,隐式因果关系的激活不是耗费资源的思维操作。而且,在双任务情况下,具有较高和较低工作内存容量的读取器的行为也有所不同。当跨度较高的读者可以使用所有工作内存资源时,他们更有可能使用隐式因果关系。小跨度阅读器显示出相反的模式,因为在增加工作内存负载的情况下,他们更有可能使用隐式因果关系提示。结果强调,语言因素和认知因素均会介导内隐因果关系对文本理解的影响。这些结果的含义是根据文献中不断发生的争议(即焦点整合辩论和关于隐含因果关系的辩论)进行讨论的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号