首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >The mechanism underlying lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-picture interference paradigm
【24h】

The mechanism underlying lexical selection: Evidence from the picture-picture interference paradigm

机译:词汇选择的基础机制:来自图片干扰范例的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In two experiments using the picture-picture and picture-word interference paradigms, we compared predictions from the swinging lexical network and the response exclusion hypothesis to determine whether the process of word selection is competitive. Further, we suggest that previous categorical effects in the picture-picture interference paradigm were due to stimuli confounds, thus readdressing the debate concerning categorical effects in the paradigm. Consistent with both hypotheses, in Experiment 1 we found faster picture naming times when distractor pictures were associatively related than when they were unrelated, explained as a result of a spread of activation at the conceptual level with little (swinging lexical network) or no (response exclusion hypothesis) contribution from lexical competition. In Experiment 2, we found a significant categorical interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm, and this effect significantly decreased but was not facilitatory when distractors were pictures. We discuss how these results are consistent with the swinging lexical network and conclude that the process to select a word is a competitive one.
机译:在使用图片-图片和图片-单词干扰范例的两个实验中,我们比较了摇摆词法网络和响应排除假设的预测,以确定单词选择的过程是否具有竞争性。此外,我们建议图像-图像干扰范式中先前的分类效应是由于刺激混杂所致,因此重新讨论了关于范式中分类效应的争论。与这两种假设一致,在实验1中,我们发现干扰物图片相关时的图片命名时间要比不相关时更快,这是由于在概念层面上的激活扩散很少(摆动的词法网络)或没有(响应)排除假设)来自词汇竞争的贡献。在实验2中,我们在图片词干扰范例中发现了明显的分类干扰效果,当干扰物为图片时,该效果显着降低,但不利于此。我们讨论了这些结果如何与不断变化的词汇网络保持一致,并得出结论,选择单词的过程是一个竞争性过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号