首页> 外文期刊>The Professional Geographer >Beyond the Edge and in Between: (Re)conceptualizing the Rural-Urban Interface as Meaning-Model-Metaphor
【24h】

Beyond the Edge and in Between: (Re)conceptualizing the Rural-Urban Interface as Meaning-Model-Metaphor

机译:超越边缘和中间:(重新)将乡村-城市界面概念化为意义模型隐喻

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As examinations of the rural-urban interface move beyond a focus on the rural or urban fringe as a location and move toward examining the patterns and processes that both divide and link rural and urban places, a broader (re)conceptualization of the rural-urban interface becomes increasingly important. Thus far the question of boundaries and interfaces between so-called urban and rural locales has mostly revolved around where and when such boundaries occur (including significant coverage of the differences and conflicts between urban vs. rural people), rather than asking what physical or social functions are being served by the rural-urban interface itself. In response, I (re)frame the rural-urban interface not only as a boundary between two distinct spaces but also as a conduit, a place of exchange, and a flux point between them. Using a particular case of contested ecologies in the exurban Sierra Nevada foothills of California, I (re)conceptualize the rural-urban interface as meaning, model, and metaphor (MMM), situating contrasting people and places in an ongoing negotiation of place and environmental meaning along the (ex)urbanizing edge. Although the differences between rural and urban are increasingly unclear, the division continues to be compelling from environmental and sociopolitical standpoints. I argue that (perceived) boundaries are instrumental in understanding physical-material change and for mitigating social conflicts occurring across them. As such, attention to the patterns, processes, and flows that connect or separate rural and urban areas is critical to forging effective and long-lasting solutions to contemporary social, economic, and environmental problems.
机译:随着对城乡接口的研究不再局限于将城乡边缘作为一个位置,而是转向研究将城乡地区分开和联系起来的模式和过程,城乡的更广泛(重新)概念化界面变得越来越重要。迄今为止,所谓的城市和农村地区之间的边界和界面问题主要围绕着这种边界发生的时间和地点(包括对城市与农村人口之间的差异和冲突的大量报道),而不是问什么物质或社会因素。功能由城乡接口本身提供。作为回应,我(重新)构筑了城乡界面,不仅作为两个不同空间之间的边界,而且还作为管道,交流的场所以及它们之间的通量点。在加利福尼亚州内华达山脉内山麓的一个特殊生态生态案例案例中,我(重新)将城乡界面概念化为意义,模型和隐喻(MMM),在不断进行的场所和环境谈判中将人与地进行对比意思是((城市)边缘化)。尽管城乡之间的差异越来越不清楚,但从环境和社会政治的角度来看,这种区分仍在继续。我认为(感知到的)边界有助于理解物质上的变化,并有助于缓解跨边界发生的社会冲突。因此,对于将农村和城市地区连接或分隔开来的模式,过程和流程的关注,对于为当代社会,经济和环境问题寻求有效而持久的解决方案至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号