首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Physiology >CrossTalk opposing view: Peripheral and central chemoreflexes have additive effects on ventilation in humans
【24h】

CrossTalk opposing view: Peripheral and central chemoreflexes have additive effects on ventilation in humans

机译:CrossTalk的相反观点:周围和中央化学反射对人类的通气有累加作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How else could the central-peripheral interaction be tested? Human experiments are often non-invasive. Consequently, differences in chemoreflex response times are frequently used to separate the central and peripheral components. An early experiment of this sort by Robbins (1988) concluded that central-peripheral interaction was more than additive. However, the same protocol was repeated by St Croix et al. (1996), who concluded that in four of the five subjects studied no interaction was evident. In similar experiments involving exercise it was concluded that a central-peripheral interaction was absent (Clement et al. 1992) because the dynamics of the peripheral and central
机译:还可以如何测试中心-外围交互?人体实验通常是非侵入性的。因此,化学反射反应时间的差异经常被用来分离中央和周围成分。 Robbins(1988)进行的此类早期实验得出的结论是,中央与外围的相互作用比加性要大。但是,St Croix等人重复了相同的协议。 (1996年),他得出的结论是,在五个研究对象中,有四个没有明显的相互作用。在涉及运动的类似实验中,得出的结论是缺乏中心-外围交互作用(Clement等,1992),因为外围和中心的动力学

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号