...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity
【24h】

The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity

机译:血管深度,直径和位置对超声引导的外周静脉导管寿命的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters (USGPIVs) have been observed to have poor durability. The current study sets out to determine whether vessel characteristics (depth, diameter, and location) predict USGPIV longevity. Methods: A secondary analysis was performed on a prospectively gathered database of patients who underwent USGPIV placement in an urban, tertiary care emergency department. All patients in the database had a 20-gauge, 48-mm-long catheter placed under ultrasound guidance. The time and reason for USGPIV removal were extracted by retrospective chart review. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results: After 48 hours from USGPIV placement, 32% (48/151) had failed prematurely, 24% (36/151) had been removed for routine reasons, and 44% (67/151) remained in working condition yielding a survival probability of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.70). Survival probability was perfect (1.00) when placed in shallow vessels (<0.4 cm), moderate (0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.71) for intermediate vessels (0.40-1.19 cm), and poor (0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.51) for deep vessels (>1.2 cm); P < .0001. Intravenous survival probability was higher when placed in the antecubital fossa or forearm locations (0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91) and lower in the brachial region (0.50; 95% CI, 0.38-0.61); P = .0002. The impact of vessel depth and location was significant after 3 hours and 18 hours, respectively. Vessel diameter did not affect USGPIV longevity. Conclusion: Cannulation of deep and proximal vessels is associated with poor USGPIV survival. Careful selection of target vessels may help improve success of USGPIV placement and durability.
机译:简介:超声引导的外周静脉导管(USGPIV)的耐用性较差。当前的研究着手确定血管特征(深度,直径和位置)是否可以预测USGPIV的寿命。方法:对前瞻性收集的在城市三级急诊科接受USGPIV安置的患者的数据库进行了二次分析。数据库中的所有患者均在超声引导下放置了一个20号,48毫米长的导管。通过回顾性图表审查来提取USGPIV的时间和原因。进行了Kaplan-Meier生存分析。结果:从USGPIV放置48小时后,有32%(48/151)提前失败,由于常规原因已去除24%(36/151),而仍有44%(67/151)处于工作状态,具有生存可能性为0.63(95%置信区间[CI],0.53-0.70)。当放置在浅血管(<0.4 cm)中时,生存几率是完美的(1.00),中级血管(0.40-1.19 cm)中度(0.62; 95%CI,0.51-0.71),差(0.29; 95%CI,0.11) -0.51)用于深血管(> 1.2 cm); P <.0001。当放置在肘前窝或前臂位置时,静脉内生存概率较高(0.83; 95%CI,0.69-0.91),而在肱臂区域则较低(0.50; 95%CI,0.38-0.61); P = .0002。分别在3小时和18小时后,血管深度和位置的影响显着。血管直径不影响USGPIV的寿命。结论:深部和近端血管插管与不良USGPIV生存有关。仔细选择目标血管可能有助于提高USGPIV放置的成功率和耐用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号