...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Impact of stress testing on 30-day cardiovascular outcomes for low-risk patients with chest pain admitted to floor telemetry beds.
【24h】

Impact of stress testing on 30-day cardiovascular outcomes for low-risk patients with chest pain admitted to floor telemetry beds.

机译:压力测试对进入地板遥测床的低风险胸痛患者30天心血管结局的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The role of immediate stress testing in low-risk patients with a potential acute coronary syndrome has not been rigorously evaluated with respect to impact on 30-day cardiovascular events. We evaluated the impact of inpatient, outpatient, or no stress testing (ETT) on 30-day cardiovascular outcomes. We performed a prospective cohort study in which consecutive patients with chest pain were admitted to a non-intensive-care telemetry bed over 16 months. Patients were identified in the ED, followed daily through hospitalization, and contacted by telephone at 30 days. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the coronary care unit, died during hospitalization, sustained an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or received cardiac catheterization before ETT. Patients were stratified according to whether they received an ETT as an inpatient, outpatient, or no ETT. Main outcomes were 30-day cardiac death, AMI, percutaneous interventions (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Data are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for main outcomes. A total of 832 patients were admitted 962 times. A total of 205 patients (21%) received an in-house ETT. Seventy-four patients (10%) without an inpatient ETT received an outpatient ETT. At baseline, the groups were similar with respect to likelihood of ischemia based on mean ACI-TIPI score and Goldman risk score. A total of 98% of patients had 30-day follow-up. The cardiovascular outcomes (with 95% confidence interval) for patients with inpatient ETT versus outpatient ETT versus no ETT were as follows: death, 0% (0-1.5%) vs 0% (0-4.1%) vs 1% (0.3-1.7%); AMI, 1% (0.1-2.4%) vs 1.4% (0.1-4.1%) vs 0.3% (0.1-0.7%); PCI, 0.5% (0.1-1.5%) vs 1.3% (0.1-4.1%) vs 0% (0-0.4%); and CABG, 0.5% (0.1-1.5%) vs 0% (0-4.1%) vs 0.2% (0.1-0.4%). There was no statistical difference in 30-day cardiovascular outcomes among patients who received inpatient, outpatient, or no ETT within 30 days. This suggests that patients with chest pain who are admitted tonon-intensive-care telemetry (or observation unit) beds might not need stress testing before hospital release.
机译:对于30天心血管事件的影响,尚未严格评估即刻压力测试在潜在的潜在急性冠状动脉综合征低危患者中的作用。我们评估了住院,门诊或无压力测试(ETT)对30天心血管结局的影响。我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,其中连续的胸痛患者在16个月内被接受了非重症监护遥测床。在急诊室对患者进行鉴定,然后每天住院,然后在30天通过电话联系。如果患者在ETT之前入院,在住院期间死亡,持续急性心肌梗死(AMI)或接受了心脏导管插入术,则将其排除在外。根据住院,门诊或未接受ETT的情况对患者进行分层。主要结局为30天心源性死亡,AMI,经皮干预(PCI)和冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)。数据以百分比表示,主要结果的置信区间(CI)为95%。共有832名患者入院962次。共有205位患者(21%)接受了室内ETT。没有住院ETT的74名患者(10%)接受了门诊ETT。在基线时,基于平均ACI-TIPI评分和Goldman风险评分,各组的缺血可能性相似。共有98%的患者进行了30天的随访。住院ETT与门诊ETT与无ETT的患者的心血管结局(置信区间为95%)如下:死亡,0%(0-1.5%)vs 0%(0-4.1%)vs 1%(0.3- 1.7%); AMI,1%(0.1-2.4%)对1.4%(0.1-4.1%)对0.3%(0.1-0.7%); PCI,0.5%(0.1-1.5%)对1.3%(0.1-4.1%)对0%(0-0.4%);和CABG,分别为0.5%(0.1-1.5%)对0%(0-4.1%)对0.2%(0.1-0.4%)。在30天内接受住院,门诊或未接受ETT的患者中,其30天的心血管结局无统计学差异。这表明,接受非重症监护遥测(或观察单元)床位的胸痛患者可能不需要在出院前进行压力测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号