首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >Treatment of moderate acute malnutrition with ready-to-use supplementary food results in higher overall recovery rates compared with a corn-soya blend in children in southern Ethiopia: An operations research trial
【24h】

Treatment of moderate acute malnutrition with ready-to-use supplementary food results in higher overall recovery rates compared with a corn-soya blend in children in southern Ethiopia: An operations research trial

机译:一项运营研究试验表明,与玉米-大豆混合食品相比,埃塞俄比亚南部儿童使用即食补充食品治疗中度急性营养不良的总体康复率更高

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Moderate and severe acute malnutrition affects 13% of children <5 y of age worldwide. Severe acute malnutrition affects fewer children but is associated with higher rates of mortality and morbidity. Supplementary feeding programs aim to treat moderate acute malnutrition and prevent the deterioration to severe acute malnutrition. Objective: The aim was to compare recovery rates of children with moderate acute malnutrition in supplementary feeding programs by using the newly recommended ration of ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) and the more conventional ration of corn-soya blend (CSB) in Ethiopia. Design: A total of 1125 children aged 6-60 mo with moderate acute malnutrition received 16 wk of CSB or RUSF. Children were randomly assigned to receive one or the other food. The daily rations were purposely based on the conventional treatment rations distributed at the time of the study in Ethiopia: 300 g CSB and 32 g vegetable oil in the control group (1413 kcal) and 92 g RUSF in the intervention group (500 kcal). The higher ration size of CSB was provided because of expected food sharing. Results: The HR for children in the CSB group was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.99), which indicated that they had 15% lower recovery (P = 0.039). Recovery rates of children at the end of the 16-wk treatment period trended higher in the RUSF group (73%) than in the CSB group (67%) (P = 0.056). Conclusion: In comparison with CSB, the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition with RUSF resulted in higher recovery rates in children, despite the large ration size and higher energy content of the conventional CSB ration. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT 01097889.
机译:背景:中度和严重的急性营养不良影响全世界13%的5岁以下儿童。严重的急性营养不良影响较少的儿童,但死亡率和发病率较高。补充喂养计划旨在治疗中度急性营养不良,并防止恶化为严重急性营养不良。目的:目的是通过使用新推荐的即食辅助食品(RUSF)和更常规的玉米豆浆(CSB)配比,比较补充喂养方案中的中度急性营养不良儿童的恢复率。埃塞俄比亚。设计:总共1125名6-60个月的中度急性营养不良儿童接受了16周的CSB或RUSF治疗。儿童被随机分配接受一种或另一种食物。每天的口粮是根据研究时在埃塞俄比亚分发的常规治疗口粮有目的的:对照组(1413 kcal)为300 g CSB和32 g植物油,干预组(500 kcal)为92 g RUSF。由于预期的食物共享,CSB的口粮量更大。结果:CSB组儿童的HR为0.85(95%CI:0.73,0.99),表明他们的康复率降低了15%(P = 0.039)。 RUSF组(16%)的儿童在16周治疗期结束时的恢复率趋于高于CSB组(67%)(P = 0.056)。结论:与常规CSB相比,RUSF治疗中度急性营养不良可导致儿童的康复率更高,尽管常规CSB日粮的日粮规模较大且能量含量较高。该试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册为NCT 01097889。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号