首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition >A novel fortified blended flour corn-soy blend plus-plus is not inferior to lipid-based ready-to-use supplementary foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Malawian children
【2h】

A novel fortified blended flour corn-soy blend plus-plus is not inferior to lipid-based ready-to-use supplementary foods for the treatment of moderate acute malnutrition in Malawian children

机译:一种新颖的强化混合面粉玉米-大豆混合食品加-加不逊于以脂类为基础的即食即食补充食品用于治疗马拉维儿童的中度急性营养不良

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Children with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) are often treated with fortified blended flours, most commonly a corn-soy blend (CSB). However, recovery rates remain <75%, lower than the rate achieved with peanut paste–based ready-to-use supplementary foods (RUSFs). To bridge this gap, a novel CSB recipe fortified with oil and dry skim milk, “CSB++,” has been developed.>Objective: In this trial we compared CSB++ with 2 RUSF products for the treatment of MAM to test the hypothesis that the recovery rate achieved with CSB++ will not be >5% worse than that achieved with either RUSF.>Design: We conducted a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled noninferiority trial involving rural Malawian children aged 6–59 mo with MAM. Children received 75 kcal CSB++ · kg−1 · d−1, locally produced soy RUSF, or an imported soy/whey RUSF for ≤12 wk.>Results: The recovery rate for CSB++ (n = 763 of 888; 85.9%) was similar to that for soy RUSF (795 of 806, 87.7%; risk difference: −1.82%; 95% CI: −4.95%, 1.30%) and soy/whey RUSF (807 of 918, 87.9%; risk difference: −1.99%; 95% CI: −5.10%, 1.13%). On average, children who received CSB++ required 2 d longer to recover, and the rate of weight gain was less than that with either RUSF, although height gain was the same among all 3 foods studied.>Conclusions: A novel, locally produced, fortified blended flour (CSB++) was not inferior to a locally produced soy RUSF and an imported soy/whey RUSF in facilitating recovery from MAM. The recovery rate observed for CSB++ was higher than that for any other fortified blended flour tested previously. This trial is registered at as .
机译:>背景:患有中度急性营养不良(MAM)的儿童经常接受强化混合面粉的治疗,最常见的是玉米-大豆混合食品(CSB)。但是,回收率仍低于75%,低于以花生酱为基础的即食辅助食品(RUSFs)所实现的回收率。为了弥合这一差距,开发了一种以油脂和干脱脂奶强化的新型CSB配方“ CSB ++”。>目的:在本试验中,我们将CSB ++与2种RUSF产品用于MAM的治疗进行了比较。测试CSB ++的恢复率不会比任一RUSF的恢复率差5%以上的假设。>设计:我们进行了一项涉及马拉维农村的前瞻性,随机,研究者盲目的对照非劣效性试验患有MAM的6–59岁儿童。孩子接受75 kcal CSB ++·kg −1 ·d −1 ,本地生产的大豆RUSF或进口的大豆/乳清RUSF≤12周。>结果: CSB ++的回收率(n = 888的763; 85.9%)与大豆RUSF的回收率(806的795,87.7%;风险差异:−1.82%; 95%CI:−4.95%,1.30) %)和大豆/乳清RUSF(918的807,占87.9%;风险差异:−1.99%; 95%CI:−5.10%,1.13%)。平均而言,接受CSB ++的儿童需要2 d的时间才能恢复,并且体重增加率低于两种RUSF的体重增加率,尽管在研究的所有3种食物中身高增加都相同。>结论:新型的本地生产的强化混合面粉(CSB ++)不逊于本地生产的大豆RUSF和进口的大豆/乳清RUSF,有助于从MAM中回收。 CSB ++的回收率高于之前测试的任何其他强化混合面粉。该试用版的注册网址为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号