...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Impact of Intensive Glycemic Control on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Associated Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study)
【24h】

Impact of Intensive Glycemic Control on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Associated Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study)

机译:严格的血糖控制对2型糖尿病患者房颤发生率和相关心血管结果的影响(从糖尿病研究中的控制心血管风险的作用)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and is associated with markers of poor glycemic control; however, the impact of glycemic control on incident AF and outcomes is unknown. The aims of this study were to prospectively evaluate if intensive glycemic control in patients with DM affects incident AF and to evaluate morbidity and mortality in patients with DM and incident AF. A total of 10,082 patients with DM from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) cohort were studied in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Participants were randomized to an intensive therapeutic strategy targeting a glycated hemoglobin level of <6.0% or a standard strategy targeting a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.0% to 7.9%. Incident AF occurred in 159 patients (1.58%) over the follow-up period, at a rate of 5.9 per 1,000 patient-years in the intensive-therapy group and a rate of 6.37 per 1,000 patient-years in the standard-therapy group (p = 0.52). In a multivariate model, predictors of incident AF were age, weight, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and heart failure history. Patients with DM and new-onset AF had a hazard ratio of 2.65 for all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 3.86, p <0.0001), a hazard ratio of 2.1 for myocardial infarction (95% confidence interval 1.33 to 3.31, p = 0.0015), and a hazard ratio of 3.80 for the development of heart failure (95% confidence interval 2.48 to 5.84, p <0.0001). In conclusion, intensive glycemic control did not affect the rate of new-onset AF. Patients with DM and incident AF had an increased risk for morbidity and mortality compared with those without AF. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:心房颤动(AF)在2型糖尿病(DM)患者中普遍存在,并且与血糖控制不良相关。然而,血糖控制对房颤和预后的影响尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是前瞻性评估DM患者的强化血糖控制是否会影响房颤,并评估DM和房颤患者的发病率和死亡率。以随机,双盲方式研究了总计10,082例来自“控制糖尿病的心血管风险”(ACCORD)队列的DM患者。参与者被随机分为针对糖化血红蛋白水平<6.0%的强化治疗策略或针对糖化血红蛋白水平7.0%至7.9%的标准策略。在随访期间,有159例患者发生房颤(1.58%),在强化治疗组中为每千名患者年5.9例,在标准治疗组中为每千人年6.37例( p = 0.52)。在多变量模型中,发生房颤的预测因素是年龄,体重,舒张压,心律和心衰史。 DM和新发房颤患者的全因死亡率风险比为2.65(95%置信区间1.8至3.86,p <0.0001),心肌梗塞的风险比为2.1(95%置信区间1.33至3.31, p = 0.0015),发生心力衰竭的危险比为3.80(95%置信区间为2.48至5.84,p <0.0001)。总之,加强血糖控制不会影响新发房颤的发生率。与没有AF的患者相比,患有DM和AF的患者发病和死亡的风险增加。 (C)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号