...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Clinical outcomes of patients with diabetic nephropathy randomized to clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone (a post hoc analysis of the clopidogrel for high atherothrombotic risk and ischemic stabilization, management, and avoidance (CHARISMA) trial).
【24h】

Clinical outcomes of patients with diabetic nephropathy randomized to clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone (a post hoc analysis of the clopidogrel for high atherothrombotic risk and ischemic stabilization, management, and avoidance (CHARISMA) trial).

机译:糖尿病肾病患者的临床结局随机分配给氯吡格雷加阿司匹林和单独使用阿司匹林(对氯吡格雷进行事后分析,以进行高动脉粥样硬化血栓形成风险和缺血稳定,管理和避免(CHARISMA)试验)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

No prospective randomized trial has specifically examined the long-term outcomes of clopidogrel use in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to determine the risks and benefits of long-term clopidogrel administration in patients with diabetic nephropathy, the most common form of chronic kidney disease. We performed a post hoc analysis of the CHARISMA trial, which randomly assigned patients without active acute coronary syndrome, but with established atherosclerotic disease (symptomatic) or multiple risk factors for atherosclerotic disease (asymptomatic), to clopidogrel plus aspirin versus placebo plus aspirin. All CHARISMA patients (n = 15,603) were separated into the 3 groups: nondiabetic patients, diabetic patients without nephropathy, and diabetic patients with nephropathy. Within each group, outcomes of patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel were compared with those of patients randomly assigned to placebo. Outcomes in the prespecified CHARISMA subgroups of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were also compared with respect to study drug assignment and nephropathy status. Patients with nephropathy who received clopidogrel had no difference in bleeding, but experienced significantly increased cardiovascular (CV) and overall mortality compared with those randomly assigned to placebo. There were no differences in bleeding, overall mortality, or CV mortality for nondiabetic or diabetic patients without nephropathy who received clopidogrel versus placebo. In the asymptomatic cohort, patients with nephropathy randomly assigned to clopidogrel had significantly increased overall and CV mortality compared with placebo, whereas asymptomatic patients without nephropathy randomly assigned to clopidogrel had no significant mortality difference compared with placebo. In conclusion, this post hoc analysis suggested that clopidogrel may be harmful in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Additional studies are needed to investigate this possible interaction.
机译:没有一项前瞻性随机试验专门检查氯吡格雷在慢性肾脏疾病患者中的长期结果。这项研究旨在确定长期服用氯吡格雷对糖尿病肾病患者(慢性肾脏病最常见的形式)的风险和益处。我们对CHARISMA试验进行了事后分析,该试验将无活动性急性冠状动脉综合症但有确定的动脉粥样硬化性疾病(有症状)或多种动脉粥样硬化性疾病的危险因素(无症状)的患者随机分配至氯吡格雷加阿司匹林与安慰剂加阿司匹林。将所有CHARISMA患者(n = 15603)分为3组:非糖尿病患者,无肾病的糖尿病患者和有肾病的糖尿病患者。在每个组中,将随机分配给氯吡格雷的患者的结局与随机分配给安慰剂的患者的结局进行了比较。还比较了无症状和有症状患者的预先定义的CHARISMA亚组的结果,以研究药物分配和肾病状态。接受氯吡格雷治疗的肾病患者的出血无差异,但与随机分配安慰剂的患者相比,心血管(CV)和总体死亡率显着提高。接受氯吡格雷和安慰剂治疗的无肾病的非糖尿病或糖尿病患者的出血,总死亡率或CV死亡率无差异。在无症状队列中,与安慰剂相比,随机分配给氯吡格雷的肾病患者的总死亡率和心血管死亡率显着增加,而无症状和随机分配给氯吡格雷的无肾病患者的死亡率没有明显差异。总之,这项事后分析表明,氯吡格雷对糖尿病肾病患者可能有害。需要进行其他研究以研究这种可能的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号