首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Under Angiographic Guidance With and Without Adjunctive Transesophageal Echocardiography
【24h】

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Under Angiographic Guidance With and Without Adjunctive Transesophageal Echocardiography

机译:血管造影引导下经导管主动脉瓣植入术,有无经食道超声心动图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still currently guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in a considerable number of hospitals, exclusive angiographic (Angio) guidance seems a reasonable approach in this setting. To date, however, no studies have directly compared the outcomes of TAVI according to the imaging modality used for procedural guidance. We, therefore, used data from a large multicenter data repository to compare the outcomes of TAVI guided exclusively by Angio and ATEE. All consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI with the CoreValve Revalving System (CRS) in 9 Italian centers from September 2007 to March 2014, dichotomized according to the imaging support used to guide the procedure (ATEE and Angio), were included. Thirty-day and 12-month clinical outcomes were evaluated. Propensity matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline differences. A total of 625 patients were included (256 and 369 patients were included in the ATEE and Angio groups, respectively). Patients from the ATEE more frequently underwent TAVI under general anesthesia compared with Angio group (37.9% vs 22.8%, respectively, p <0.001). Importantly, similar to 80% of the patients experienced mild or even less. aortic regurgitation as assessed by angiography after the procedure, without between-group differences. Postdilation and valve-in-valve rates were equivalent (24.7% vs 25%, p = 0.934 and 5.5% vs 3.4%, respectively, p = 0.217). No differences were revealed in the rates of death, cardiovascular death, and stroke or transient ischemic attack at 12-month follow-up. These results were sustained after propensity matching analysis. In conclusion, as long as a comprehensive procedural planning is performed, TAVI with CRS may be performed exclusively under angiographic guidance without the need for associated TEE. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管目前在许多医院中仍通过经食道超声心动图(TEE)指导经导管主动脉瓣植入(TAVI),但在这种情况下,独家血管造影(Angio)指导似乎是一种合理的方法。然而,迄今为止,还没有研究根据用于程序指导的成像方式直接比较TAVI的结果。因此,我们使用来自大型多中心数据库的数据来比较仅由Angio和ATEE指导的TAVI的结果。纳入所有自2007年9月至2014年3月在意大利9个中心接受CoreValve Revalving System(CRS)治疗的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者,并根据指导手术的影像学支持将其分为两部分(ATEE和Angio)。评估了30天和12个月的临床结局。进行倾向匹配分析以调整基线差异。总共包括625位患者(ATEE和Angio组分别包括256位和369位患者)。与Angio组相比,在全身麻醉下来自ATEE的患者接受TAVI的频率更高(分别为37.9%和22.8%,p <0.001)。重要的是,大约80%的患者经历了轻度甚至更少的经历。手术后通过血管造影评估的主动脉瓣关闭不全,组间无差异。扩张后和瓣膜内瓣膜的发生率相等(分别为24.7%和25%,p = 0.934和5.5%vs 3.4%,p = 0.217)。在12个月的随访中,死亡率,心血管死亡,中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的发生率无差异。这些结果在倾向匹配分析后得以维持。总之,只要执行了全面的程序规划,就可以仅在血管造影指导下执行带有CRS的TAVI,而无需相关的TEE。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号