首页> 外文期刊>The Laryngoscope: A Medical Journal for Clinical and Research Contributions in Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery .. >Eighteen years of experience in Mohs micrographic surgery and conventional excision for nonmelanoma skin cancer treated by a single facial plastic surgeon and pathologist.
【24h】

Eighteen years of experience in Mohs micrographic surgery and conventional excision for nonmelanoma skin cancer treated by a single facial plastic surgeon and pathologist.

机译:由一位面部整形外科医生和病理学家治疗的Mohs显微外科手术和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌常规切除术的18年经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine and compare the efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS)- and conventional excision (CE)-confirmed resection of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of NMSCs treated in a tertiary referral center by a single facial plastic surgeon and a group of five histopathologists over an 18-year period. The treatment modality was either MMS or CE. The primary outcome measure was recurrence of disease. The secondary outcome measure was the size of resulting surgical excision defect. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2008, 795 patients were treated with MMS and 709 with CE. The median follow-up period for MMS was 24 months and for CE 16 months. Disease recurred in 6/795 and 7/709 patients, respectively (P = .78). Analysis of the resection defects with general linear models adjusted for localization and primary or recurrent disease showed significantly smaller defects after MMS (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that: 1) MMS and CE are safe in terms of recurrence rates in NMSCs; 2) MMS can be performed adequately by an experienced facial plastic surgeon in close collaboration with a group of pathologists; and 3) the advantage of MMS is that resection defects can be minimized in important aesthetic and functional areas, such as the nose and eyelid, possibly facilitating the reconstruction.
机译:目的/假设:为了确定和比较莫氏显微摄影术(MMS)和常规切除术(CE)证实的非黑素瘤皮肤癌(NMSCs)切除术的疗效。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是由一名面部整形外科医生和五名组织病理学家组成的小组在一个三级转诊中心治疗了18年。治疗方式为MMS或CE。主要结果指标是疾病的复发。次要结果指标是手术切除缺损的大小。结果:在1990年至2008年之间,接受MMS治疗的患者为795名,接受CE的患者为709名。 MMS的中位随访期为24个月,CE的中位随访期为16个月。该病分别在6/795和7/709患者中复发(P = 0.78)。使用针对局部性和原发性或复发性疾病调整的一般线性模型对切除缺陷进行分析,发现MMS后的缺陷明显较小(P = .008)。结论:本研究表明:1)就NMSCs的复发率而言,MMS和CE是安全的; 2)由经验丰富的面部整形外科医生与一组病理学家密切合作,可以适当地进行MMS; 3)MMS的优势在于可以在重要的美学和功能区域(例如鼻子和眼睑)将切除缺陷减至最少,从而可能有助于重建。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号