...
【24h】

Complication rates of open surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients

机译:危重病人开腹手术与经皮气管切开术的并发症发生率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundIn the setting of critical care, the most common indications for tracheostomy include: prolonged intubation, to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation, and for pulmonary toileting. In this setting, tracheostomy can be performed either via open surgical or percutaneous technique. Advantages for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) include: simplicity, smaller incision, less tissue trauma, lower incidence of wound infection, lower incidence of peristomal bleeding, decreased morbidity from patient transfer, and cost-effectiveness. Despite many studies comparing surgical tracheostomy (ST) versus PDT, there remains no consensus on which of these techniques minimizes complications in critically ill patients.
机译:背景在重症监护室中,气管切开术最常见的适应症包括:长时间插管,以利于机械通气的断奶,以及进行肺部冲洗。在这种情况下,可以通过开放式手术或经皮技术进行气管切开术。经皮扩张气管切开术(PDT)的优点包括:简单,切口小,组织创伤小,伤口感染的发生率低,皮膜周围出血的发生率低,患者转移的发病率降低以及成本效益。尽管有许多研究比较了外科气管切开术(ST)与PDT,但对于哪种技术可以最大程度地减少重症患者的并发症仍未达成共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号