...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists >Tension-free vaginal tape compared with laparoscopic burch urethropexy.
【24h】

Tension-free vaginal tape compared with laparoscopic burch urethropexy.

机译:无张力的阴道胶带与腹腔镜下尿道尿道穿刺术相比。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure in women with genuine stress incontinence. DESIGN: Randomized clinical study (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-six consecutive women. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (23) and TVT procedure (23). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Valsalva leak-point pressure increased after surgery in both groups, but TVT substantially decreased maximum urinary flow rate. Other urodynamic studies showed no statistical differences. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to intraoperative complications or objective and subjective cure rates. Operating time was significantly longer for laparoscopic Burch (p = 0.001), and three patients in that group required conversion to laparotomy. Length of hospital stay (p = 0.003) and duration of catheterization (p = 0.003) were shorter in the TVT group. CONCLUSION: TVT holds promise in women with genuine stress incontinence, with several advantages over laparoscopic Burch.
机译:目的:比较真正的压力性尿失禁妇女的腹腔镜Burch colposuspensuspension和无张力阴道带(TVT)手术。设计:随机临床研究(加拿大工作组I级)。地点:三级护理大学医院。患者:46名连续女性。干预:腹腔镜Burch结肠悬吊术(23)和TVT手术(23)。测量和主要结果:两组患者瓦尔瓦尔漏点的压力均升高,但TVT显着降低了最大尿流率。其他尿动力学研究显示无统计学差异。两组在术中并发症或客观和主观治愈率方面无显着差异。腹腔镜Burch手术时间明显更长(p = 0.001),该组中的三名患者需要转换为剖腹手术。 TVT组的住院时间(p = 0.003)和导管插入时间(p = 0.003)较短。结论:TVT在真正具有压力性尿失禁的女性中有希望,与腹腔镜Burch相比有几个优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号