首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America >Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: Implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss
【24h】

Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: Implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss

机译:听力损失的危险因素分布:评估职业噪声诱发的听力损失的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents an analysis of hearing threshold levels among 2066 white male workers employed in various U.S. industries studied in the 1968-72 NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). The distribution of hearing threshold levels (HTL) is examined in relation to various risk factors (age, prior occupational noise, medical conditions (for hearing loss among a population of noise exposed and control (low noise-exposed) industrial workers. Previous analyses of a subset of these data from the ONHS focused on 1172 highly "screened" workers. An additional 894 male workers (609 noise-exposed and 285 controls), who were excluded for various reasons (i.e., nonoccupational noise exposure, otologic or medical conditions affecting hearing, prior occupational noise exposure) have been added to examine hearing loss in an unscreened population. Data are analyzed by age, duration of exposure, and sound level (8-h TWA) by individual test frequency. Results indicate that hearing threshold levels are higher among unscreened noise-exposed and control workers relative to screened workers. Analysis of risk factors such as nonoccupational noise exposure, medical conditions, and type of industry among unscreened controls indicated that these factors were not significantly associated with increased mean HTLs or risk of material impairment over and above what is expected due to age. Age-specific mean hearing threshold levels (and percentiles of the distribution) among the unscreened ONHS control population may be used as a comparison population of low-noise exposed white male industrial workers for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs for workers less than 55 years of age. To make valid inferences regarding occupational noise-induced hearing loss, it is important to use hearing data from reference (control) populations that are similar with respect to the degree of subject screening, type of work force (blue vs white collar), and the distribution of other risk factors for hearing loss.
机译:本文对1968-72年NIOSH职业噪声与听力调查(ONHS)中研究的美国各行业2066名白人男性工人的听力阈值水平进行了分析。根据各种风险因素(年龄,先前的职业噪声,医疗状况(针对暴露于噪声的人群和控制(低噪声)的)工业工人中的听力损失),检查了听力阈值水平(HTL)的分布。 ONHS收集的这些数据的一部分集中于1172名经过“筛查”的工人,另有894名男性工人(609名受噪声影响的工人和285名控制人员),由于各种原因(例如,非职业性噪声暴露,耳科或医疗状况受到影响)而被排除在外听力,以前的职业噪声暴露)被添加到未筛查人群中,以检查听力损失,并根据年龄,暴露持续时间和声音水平(8小时TWA)按个别测试频率进行分析,结果表明听力阈值水平为未筛查的接触噪声和控制的工人相对于筛查的工人更高。危险因素分析,例如非职业噪声暴露,医疗状况和疾病类型未筛查的对照者进行的筛查表明,这些因素与平均HTL的增加或由于年龄造成的预期之外的物质损害风险没有显着相关。未筛查的ONHS对照人群中特定年龄的平均听力阈值水平(和分布的百分位数)可以用作低噪声暴露的白人男性工业工人的比较人群,以评估针对55岁以下工人的听力保护计划的有效性年龄。为了对职业噪声引起的听力损失做出有效的推断,重要的是使用来自参考(对照)人群的听力数据,这些数据在受试者筛查的程度,劳动力的类型(蓝领还是白领)以及听力损失的其他危险因素分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号