...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America >Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among unscreened male industrial workers
【24h】

Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among unscreened male industrial workers

机译:未筛查的男性工业工人中由噪声引起的听力损失的风险评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Variability in background risk and distribution of various risk factors for hearing loss may explain some of the diversity in excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This paper examines the impact of various risk factors on excess risk estimates of NIHL using data from the 1968-1972 NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). Previous analyses of a subset of these data focused on 1172 highly "screened" workers. In the current analysis, an additional 894 white males (609 noise-exposed and 285 controls), who were excluded for various reasons (i.e., nonoccupational noise exposure, otologic or medical conditions affecting hearing, prior occupational noise exposure) have been added (n = 2066) to assess excess risk of noise-induced material impairment in an unscreened population. Data are analyzed by age, duration of exposure, and sound level (8-h TWA) for four different definitions of noise-induced hearing impairment, defined as the binaural pure-tone average (PTA) hearing threshold level greater than 25 dB for the following frequencies: (a) 1-4 kHz (PTA_(1234)), (b) 1-3 kHz (PTA_(123)), (c) 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz (PTA_(512)), and (d) 3, 4, and 6 kHz (PTA_(346)). Results indicate that populations with higher background risks of hearing loss may show lower excess risks attributable to noise relative to highly screened populations. Estimates of lifetime excess risk of hearing impairment were found to be significantly different between screened and unscreened population for noise levels greater than 90 dBA. Predicted age-related risk of material hearing impairment in the ONHS unscreened population was similar to that predicted from Annex B and C of ANSI S3.44 for ages less than 60 years. Results underscore the importance of understanding differential risk patterns for hearing loss and the use of appropriate reference (control) populations when evaluating risk of noise-induced hearing impairment among contemporary industrial populations.
机译:背景风险的变化和各种听力损失风险因素的分布可能解释了噪声诱发的听力损失(NIHL)的额外风险中的某些多样性。本文使用1968-1972年NIOSH职业噪声与听力调查(ONHS)的数据,研究了各种风险因素对NIHL超额风险估计的影响。先前对这些数据的子集进行的分析集中于1172个经过高度“筛选”的工人。在当前的分析中,增加了894名白人男性(609名受噪声暴露和285名对照),由于各种原因(即,非职业性噪声暴露,影响听力的耳科或医疗状况,先前的职业性噪声暴露)被排除在外(n = 2066),以评估未筛查人群中噪声引起的物质损害的额外风险。根据年龄,暴露持续时间和声级(8-h TWA)对数据进行四种分析,以分析噪声引起的听力障碍的数据,定义为双耳纯音平均(PTA)听力阈值水平大于25 dB。以下频率:(a)1-4 kHz(PTA_(1234)),(b)1-3 kHz(PTA_(123)),(c)0.5、1和2 kHz(PTA_(512))和( d)3、4和6 kHz(PTA_(346))。结果表明,与高度筛查的人群相比,具有较高听力损失背景风险的人群可能显示出较低的由噪声引起的额外风险。对于噪声水平大于90 dBA的被筛查人群和未筛查人群,发现终生对听力障碍的过度风险估计存在显着差异。在未筛选的ONHS人群中,与年龄相关的物质性听力障碍的风险与60岁以下的ANSI S3.44附录B和C相似。结果强调了在评估当代工业人群中由噪声引起的听力障碍的风险时,了解听力损失的不同风险模式和使用适当的参考(对照)人群的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号