...
首页> 外文期刊>The Knee >Comparison of the ceiling effect in the Lysholm score and the IKDC subjective score for assessing functional outcome after ACL reconstruction
【24h】

Comparison of the ceiling effect in the Lysholm score and the IKDC subjective score for assessing functional outcome after ACL reconstruction

机译:比较Lysholm评分和IKDC主观评分的上限效应,以评估ACL重建后的功能结局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: To compare the ceiling effect of the Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores for assessing functional outcome after ACL reconstruction and evaluated the correlation with the one-leg hop test. Methods: A total of 134 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2007 and 2011 were enrolled in this study. All patients fulfilled the postoperative 6- and 12-month evaluations. The ceiling effect of the Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores was assessed, and the correlations between two scales and one-leg hop test were analysed. Results: For the entire sample, the ceiling effect for the Lysholm score was 14.9% and 30.6% at 6 and 12. months postoperatively. The values for the IKDC subjective score were 5.2% and 17.2%, respectively. In all subjects, the correlation coefficients [95% confidence intervals] between the IKDC subjective score and one-leg hop test at 6 and 12. months (r=. 0.492, [0.34 to 0.62]; r=. 0.296, [0.12 to 0.46]) were higher than those for the Lysholm score (r=. 0.355, [0.18 to 0.51]; r=. 0.241, [0.06 to 0.41]), respectively.(p < 0.05). Conclusion: With regard to evaluating ACL reconstruction outcomes in patients, no significant difference between the IKDC subjective and the Lysholm scores exists in terms of the amount of ceiling effect and the correlation with the LSI. However, the concern that the ceiling effect of the Lysholm score was greater than the IKDC subjective score, should be addressed in assessing the patient's functional status postoperatively. Level of evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.
机译:背景:为了比较Lysholm和IKDC主观评分对ACL重建后评估功能结局的上限效果,并评估了单腿跳测试的相关性。方法:2007年至2011年间共134例行ACL重建的患者入选本研究。所有患者均完成了术后6个月和12个月的评估。评估了Lysholm和IKDC主观评分的上限效应,并分析了两个量表和单腿跳测试之间的相关性。结果:对于整个样本,Lysholm评分在手术后6和12个月的最高影响分别为14.9%和30.6%。 IKDC主观评分分别为5.2%和17.2%。在所有受试者中,IKDC主观评分与单腿跳试验在6和12个月之间的相关系数[95%置信区间](r =。0.492,[0.34至0.62]; r = .0.296,[0.12至0.46])分别高于Lysholm得分(r = .0.355,[0.18至0.51]; r = .0.241,[0.06至0.41])(p <0.05)。结论:关于评估患者的ACL重建结局,就上限效应的量以及与LSI的相关性而言,IKDC主观评分与Lysholm评分之间没有显着差异。但是,Lysholm评分的上限效应大于IKDC主观评分的担忧,应在术后评估患者的功能状态时解决。证据水平:三,回顾性比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号