首页> 外文期刊>The lancet oncology >Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
【24h】

Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:胰腺癌切除术的辅助治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Major adjuvant treatments for pancreatic adenocarcinoma include fluorouracil, gemcitabine, chemoradiation, and chemoradiation plus fluorouracil or gemcitabine. Since the optimum regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these treatments in terms of overall survival after tumour resection and in terms of grade 3-4 toxic effects with a systematic review and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed, trial registries, and related reviews and abstracts for randomised controlled trials comparing the above five treatments with each other or observation alone before April 30, 2013. We estimated relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death and relative odds ratios (ORs) for toxic effects among different therapies by combining HRs for death and survival durations and ORs for toxic effects of included trials. We assessed the effects of prognostic factors on survival benefits of adjuvant therapies with meta-regression. Findings: Ten eligible articles reporting nine trials were included. Compared with observation, the HRs for death were 0·62 (95% credible interval 0·42-0·88) for fluorouracil, 0·68 (0·44-1·07) for gemcitabine, 0·91 (0·55-1·46) for chemoradiation, 0·54 (0·15-1·80) for chemoradiation plus fluorouracil, and 0·44 (0·10-1·81) for chemoradiation plus gemcitabine. The proportion of patients with positive lymph nodes was inversely associated with the survival benefit of adjuvant treatments. After adjustment for this factor, fluorouracil (HR 0·65, 0·49-0·84) and gemcitabine (0·59, 0·41-0·83) improved survival compared with observation, whereas chemoradiation resulted in worse survival than fluorouracil (1·69, 1·12-2·54) or gemcitabine (1·86, 1·04-3·23). Chemoradiation plus gemcitabine was ranked the most toxic, with significantly higher haematological toxic effects than second-ranked chemoradiation plus fluorouracil (OR 13·33, 1·01-169·36). Interpretation: Chemotherapy with fluorouracil or gemcitabine is the optimum adjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and reduces mortality after surgery by about a third. Chemoradiation plus chemotherapy is less effective in prolonging survival and is more toxic than chemotherapy. Funding: None.
机译:背景:胰腺腺癌的主要辅助治疗包括氟尿嘧啶,吉西他滨,化学放射治疗和化学放射加氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨。由于最佳治疗方案尚无定论,因此我们旨在比较这些治疗在肿瘤切除后的总体存活率和3-4级毒性作用方面的效果,并进行系统的综述和随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。方法:我们在2013年4月30日之前对PubMed,试验注册中心以及相关的评论和摘要进行了比较,比较了上述5种治疗方法或单独观察的随机对照试验。我们估计了死亡的相对危险度(HRs)和相对优势比(通过组合用于死亡和生存期的HR和用于纳入试验的毒性作用的ORs来比较不同疗法之间的毒性作用。我们评估了预后因素对Meta回归辅助治疗生存获益的影响。结果:纳入十篇符合条件的文章,报道了九项试验。与观察相比,氟尿嘧啶的死亡HRs为0·62(95%可信区间0·42-0·88),吉西他滨为0·68(0·44-1·07),0·91(0·55) -1·46)用于化学放射,0·54(0·15-1·80)用于化学放射加氟尿嘧啶,而0·44(0·10-1·81)用于化学放射加吉西他滨。淋巴结阳性患者的比例与辅助治疗的生存获益呈负相关。对此因素进行调整后,氟尿嘧啶(HR 0·65,0·49-0·84)和吉西他滨(0·59,0·41-0·83)与观察值相比改善了生存率,而化学放疗导致的生存期比氟尿嘧啶差(1·69,1·12-2·54)或吉西他滨(1·86,1·04-3·23)。化学放疗加吉西他滨的毒性最高,其血液学毒性明显高于第二放化疗加氟尿嘧啶(OR 13·33、1·01-169·36)。解释:氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨的化学疗法是胰腺腺癌的最佳辅助治疗方法,可使术后死亡率降低约三分之一。化学放射加化学疗法在延长生存期方面效果较差,并且比化学疗法毒性更大。资金:无。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号