首页> 外文期刊>The lancet oncology >The Goldilocks' problem of cancer medicines.
【24h】

The Goldilocks' problem of cancer medicines.

机译:金发姑娘的癌症药物问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rarely does a week go past without a further addition to the already monumental corpus of literature on pharmaceutical policy. Cancer medicines and particularly NICE-related issues in policies and access to cancer drugs have now become the major news item for the UK media, adding fuel to an already flammable mixture of pharmaceutical industry and politics. In the heat of these ongoing debates, however, serious policy issues of cancer drug access, affordability, and usage remain ever present. The most recent addition to this policy debate has attempted to look into the extent and causes of international variations in drug usage in 14 countries with 14 different categories of drugs. This complex study used data supplied by a consulting company, IMS Health, and the manufacturers themselves. Data for drug usage were delivered as a country ranking or as a percentage of a European average made up of different combinations of countries, or as both. Overall, the UK ranked twelfth, but this method of ranking drug usage hid major variation. For example, for cancer drugs launched between 6 and 10 years ago,the UK was ranked ninth in usage but, for some individual drugs such as alemtuzumab, we were ranked first.
机译:很少有一个星期过去了,而无需进一步补充已经非常重要的药物政策文献集。癌症药物,尤其是政策和获得癌症药物的NICE相关问题,现在已成为英国媒体的主要新闻,为早已易燃的制药业和政治混合物增添了动力。然而,在这些正在进行的辩论中,关于癌症药物获取,可负担性和使用的严重政策问题仍然存在。这项政策辩论的最新内容是试图研究14种毒品种类不同的14个国家中毒品使用的国际差异的程度和原因。这项复杂的研究使用了咨询公司IMS Health和制造商本身提供的数据。毒品使用数据以国家/地区排名或由欧洲国家/地区组成的欧洲平均值的百分比或两者的形式提供。总体而言,英国排名第十二,但这种对毒品使用情况进行排名的方法隐藏了很大的差异。例如,在6至10年前推出的抗癌药物中,英国的使用量排名第九,但对于某些单独的药物(例如alemtuzumab),我们排名第一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号