...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet infectious diseases >Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:为减少欠发达国家的腹泻而采取的水,卫生和卫生干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many studies have reported the results of interventions to reduce illness through improvements in drinking water, sanitation facilities, and hygiene practices in less developed countries. There has, however, been no formal systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the evidence of the relative effectiveness of these interventions. We developed a comprehensive search strategy designed to identify all peer-reviewed articles, in any language, that presented water, sanitation, or hygiene interventions. We examined only those articles with specific measurement of diarrhoea morbidity as a health outcome in non-outbreak conditions. We screened the titles and, where necessary, the abstracts of 2120 publications. 46 studies were judged to contain relevant evidence and were reviewed in detail. Data were extracted from these studies and pooled by meta-analysis to provide summary estimates of the effectiveness of each type of intervention. All of the interventions studied were found to reduce significantly the risks of diarrhoeal illness. Most of the interventions had a similar degree of impact on diarrhoeal illness, with the relative risk estimates from the overall meta-analyses ranging between 0.63 and 0.75. The results generally agree with those from previous reviews, but water quality interventions (point-of-use water treatment) were found to be more effective than previously thought, and multiple interventions (consisting of combined water, sanitation, and hygiene measures) were not more effective than interventions with a single focus. There is some evidence of publication bias in the findings from the hygiene and water treatment interventions.
机译:许多研究报告了干预措施的结果,这些干预措施通过改善欠发达国家的饮用水,卫生设施和卫生习惯来减少疾病。但是,还没有正式的系统评价和荟萃分析来比较这些干预措施相对有效性的证据。我们开发了一种全面的搜索策略,旨在识别所有经过同行评审的,以任何语言表示饮水,卫生或卫生干预措施的文章。我们仅检查了在非暴发条件下以腹泻发病率作为健康结果的特定测量指标的文章。我们筛选了2120种出版物的标题和摘要(如有必要)。判定46项研究包含相关证据,并进行了详细审查。从这些研究中提取数据并通过荟萃分析进行汇总,以提供每种干预措施有效性的汇总估算。研究发现,所有研究的干预措施均可以显着降低腹泻病的风险。大多数干预措施对腹泻病的影响程度相似,总体荟萃分析的相对风险估计值在0.63至0.75之间。结果总体上与先前的评论一致,但是水质干预(使用点水处理)被发现比以前认为的更为有效,而多种干预(包括水,卫生和卫生措施的综合措施)却没有比单一重点干预更为有效。在卫生和水处理干预措施的发现中有一些出版物存在偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号