...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet infectious diseases >Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): A randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
【24h】

Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): A randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

机译:对于急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染,替地唑胺治疗6天,利奈唑胺治疗10天(ESTABLISH-2):一项随机,双盲,3期非劣效性试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: New antibiotics are needed to treat infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. Tedizolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial drug designed to provide enhanced activity against Gram-positive pathogens. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous to oral tedizolid for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. Methods: ESTABLISH-2 was a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done between Sept 28, 2011, and Jan 10, 2013, at 58 centres in nine countries. Patients (aged ≥12 years) with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (cellulitis or erysipelas, major cutaneous abscess, or wound infection) that had a minimum lesion area of 75 cm2 and were suspected or documented to be associated with a Gram-positive pathogen, were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive voice-response system with block randomisation, to receive intravenous once-daily tedizolid (200 mg for 6 days) or twice-daily linezolid (600 mg for 10 days), with optional oral step-down. Randomisation was stratified by geographic region and type of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection. The primary endpoint was early clinical response (≥20% reduction in lesion area at 48-72 h compared with baseline), with a non-inferiority margin of -10%. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01421511. Findings: 666 patients were randomly assigned to receive tedizolid (n=332) or linezolid (n=334). 283 (85%) patients in the tedizolid group and 276 (83%) in the linezolid group achieved early clinical response (difference 2·6%, 95% CI -3·0 to 8·2), meeting the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Gastrointestinal adverse events were less frequent with tedizolid than linezolid, taking place in 52 (16%) of 331 patients and 67 (20%) of 327 patients in the safety population. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation of study drug were reported by one (1%) patient in the tedizolid group and four (1%) patients in the linezolid group. Interpretation: Intravenous to oral once-daily tedizolid 200 mg for 6 days was non-inferior to twice-daily linezolid 600 mg for 10 days for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. Tedizolid could become a useful option for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in the hospital and outpatient settings. Funding: Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
机译:背景:需要新的抗生素来治疗由耐药菌引起的感染。 Tedizolid是一种新型恶唑烷酮抗菌药物,旨在提供增强的抗革兰氏阳性病原体活性。我们的目的是评估静脉使用泰替唑酯治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性。方法:ESTABLISH-2是一项在2011年9月28日至2013年1月10日期间在9个国家/地区的58个中心进行的一项随机,双盲,3期非劣效性试验。患有急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(蜂窝组织炎或丹毒,严重皮肤脓肿或伤口感染)的患者(年龄≥12岁)的最小病灶面积为75 cm2,并怀疑或证明与革兰氏病相关。阳性病原体通过交互式语音应答系统(带有分组随机分配)被随机分配(1:1),以接受静脉注射一次替地唑酯(200 mg,6天)或每天两次利奈唑胺(600 mg,10天),与可选的口服降压药。随机分组按急性细菌皮肤和皮肤结构感染的地理区域和类型进行。主要终点为早期临床反应(与基线相比,在48-72 h病变面积减少≥20%),非劣效性为-10%。分析是按意向进行的。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT01421511。研究结果:666名患者被随机分配接受泰替尼(n = 332)或利奈唑胺(n = 334)。替佐利德组中的283名患者(85%)和利奈唑胺组中的276名患者(83%)达到了早期临床反应(差异为2·6%,95%CI -3·0至8·2),符合预定的非自卑感保证金。在安全人群中,使用替佐利德的胃肠道不良事件发生率低于利奈唑胺,发生率分别为331例患者中的52例(16%)和327例患者中的67例(20%)。替佐利德组中有1名(<1%)患者和利奈唑胺组中有4名(1%)患者报告了导致研究药物停药的紧急治疗不良事件。解释:对于治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的患者,每天口服一次替地唑200 mg静脉滴注6天的效果不逊于每天两次利奈唑胺600 mg静脉滴注10天。 Tedizolid可能成为在医院和门诊治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的有用选择。资金来源:立体主义制药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号