首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Transmyocardial laser revascularisation compared with continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a prospective randomised trial. ATLANTIC Investigators. Angina Treatments-Lasers and Normal Therapies in Comparison.
【24h】

Transmyocardial laser revascularisation compared with continued medical therapy for treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a prospective randomised trial. ATLANTIC Investigators. Angina Treatments-Lasers and Normal Therapies in Comparison.

机译:经心肌激光血运重建与持续药物治疗难治性心绞痛的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。大西洋调查员。比较心绞痛-激光和正常疗法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Transmyocardial revascularisation (TMR) is an operative treatment for refractory angina pectoris when bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is not indicated. We did a prospective randomised trial to compare TMR with continued medication. METHODS: We recruited 182 patients from 16 US centres with Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina (CCSA) score III (38%) or IV (62%), reversible ischaemia, and incomplete response to other therapies. Patients were randomly assigned TMR and continued medication (n=92) or continued medication alone (n=90). Baseline assessments were angina class, exercise tolerance, Seattle angina questionnaire for quality of life, and dipyridamole thallium stress test. We reassessed patients at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, with independent masked angina assessment at 12 months. FINDINGS: At 12 months, total exercise tolerance increased by a median of 65 s in the TMR group compared with a 46 s decrease in the medication-only group (p<0.0001, median difference 111 s). Independent CCSA score was II or lower in 47.8% in the TMR group compared with 14.3% in the medication-only group (p<0.001). Each Seattle angina questionnaire index increased in the TMR group significantly more than in the medication-only group (p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: TMR lowered angina scores, increased exercise tolerance time, and improved patients' perceptions of quality of life. This operative treatment provided clinical benefits in patients with no other therapeutic options.
机译:背景:当不建议进行旁路手术或经皮腔内血管成形术时,经心肌血运重建术(TMR)是治疗难治性心绞痛的有效方法。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,以比较TMR与持续用药。方法:我们从美国16个中心的182名加拿大心血管协会心绞痛(CCSA)评分为III(38%)或IV(62%),可逆性缺血和对其他疗法反应不完全的患者中招募了患者。患者被随机分配TMR并继续用药(n = 92)或单独继续用药(n = 90)。基线评估为心绞痛类别,运动耐量,西雅图生活质量心绞痛问卷和双嘧达莫th压力测试。我们在3个月,6个月和12个月时对患者进行了重新评估,并在12个月时进行了独立的掩盖型心绞痛评估。结果:在12个月时,TMR组的总运动耐力中值增加了65 s,而仅药物治疗组的总运动耐力下降了46 s(p <0.0001,中值差异111 s)。在TMR组中,独立CCSA评分为II或更低,为47.8%,而仅药物治疗组为14.3%(p <0.001)。在TMR组中,每个西雅图心绞痛调查问卷指数的增加均明显大于仅药物治疗组(p <0.001)。解释:TMR降低了心绞痛评分,增加了运动耐力时间,并改善了患者对生活质量的看法。对于没有其他治疗选择的患者,这种手术治疗可提供临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号