首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Chemotherapy versus allogeneic transplantation for very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission: comparison by genetic randomisation in an international prospective study.
【24h】

Chemotherapy versus allogeneic transplantation for very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission: comparison by genetic randomisation in an international prospective study.

机译:首次完全缓解的高危儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的化学疗法与同种异体移植:国际前瞻性研究中通过基因随机比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The dismal prognosis of very-high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia could be improved by allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation. We compared this strategy with intensified chemotherapy protocols, with the aim to improve the outcome of children with very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission. METHODS: A cooperative prospective study was set up in seven countries. Very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in first complete remission was defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria: (1) failure to achieve complete remission after the first four-drug induction phase; (2) t(9;22) or t(4;11) clonal abnormalities; and (3) poor response to prednisone associated with T immunophenotype, white-blood-cell count of 100x10(9)/L or greater, or both. Children were allocated treatment by genetic chance, according to the availability of a compatible related donor, and assigned chemotherapy or haemopoietic-cell transplantation. The primaryoutcome was disease-free survival and analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Between April, 1995, and December, 2000, 357 children entered the study, of whom 280 were assigned chemotherapy and 77 related-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation. 5-year disease-free survival was 40.6% (SE 3.1) in children allocated chemotherapy and 56.7% (5.7) in those assigned transplantation (hazard ratio 0.67 [95% CI 0.46-0.99]; p=0.02); 5-year survival was 50.1% (3.1) and 56.4% (5.9), respectively (0.73 [0.49-1.09]; p=0.12). INTERPRETATION: Children with very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia benefit from related-donor haemopoietic-cell transplantation compared with chemotherapy. The gap between the two strategies increases as the risk profile of the patient worsens.
机译:背景:同种异体造血细胞移植可以改善儿童高危急性淋巴细胞白血病的不良预后。我们将这种策略与强化化疗方案进行了比较,目的是改善初次完全缓解时极高风险的急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童的结局。方法:在七个国家建立了合作性前瞻性研究。首次完全缓解时的高危急性淋巴细胞白血病的定义是,至少存在以下一项标准:(1)在第一种四药诱导期后未能实现完全缓解; (2)t(9; 22)或t(4; 11)克隆异常; (3)对与泼尼松相关的T免疫表型,白细胞计数为100x10(9)/ L或更高或两者均更高的不良反应。根据相容性相关供体的可用性,通过遗传机会为儿童分配治疗,并分配化学疗法或造血细胞移植。主要结果是无病生存,分析是有意治疗的。结果:在1995年4月至2000年12月之间,共有357名儿童进入研究,其中280名接受了化学疗法和77名相关供体造血细胞移植。接受化疗的儿童的5年无病生存率为40.6%(SE 3.1),接受移植的儿童为56.7%(5.7)(危险比0.67 [95%CI 0.46-0.99]; p = 0.02); 5年生存率分别为50.1%(3.1)和56.4%(5.9)(0.73 [0.49-1.09]; p = 0.12)。解释:与化学疗法相比,患高风险急性淋巴细胞白血病的儿童受益于相关供体造血细胞移植。两种策略之间的差距随着患者风险状况的恶化而增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号