...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.
【24h】

Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

机译:VALUE缬沙坦或氨氯地平治疗方案治疗的高心血管风险高血压患者的结局:VALUE随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial was designed to test the hypothesis that for the same blood-pressure control, valsartan would reduce cardiac morbidity and mortality more than amlodipine in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk. METHODS: 15?245 patients, aged 50 years or older with treated or untreated hypertension and high risk of cardiac events participated in a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of therapy based on valsartan or amlodipine. Duration of treatment was event-driven and the trial lasted until at least 1450 patients had reached a primary endpoint, defined as a composite of cardiac mortality and morbidity. Patients from 31 countries were followed up for a mean of 4.2 years. FINDINGS: Blood pressure was reduced by both treatments, but the effects of the amlodipine-based regimen were more pronounced, especially in the early period (blood pressure 4.0/2.1 mm Hg lower in amlodipine than valsartan group after 1 month; 1.5/1.3 mm Hg after 1 year; p<0.001 between groups). The primary composite endpoint occurred in 810 patients in the valsartan group (10.6%, 25.5 per 1000 patient-years) and 789 in the amlodipine group (10.4%, 24.7 per 1000 patient-years; hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15, p=0.49). INTERPRETATION: The main outcome of cardiac disease did not differ between the treatment groups. Unequal reductions in blood pressure might account for differences between the groups in cause-specific outcomes. The findings emphasise the importance of prompt blood-pressure control in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk.
机译:背景:缬沙坦抗高血压药物长期使用评估(VALUE)试验旨在验证以下假设:在血压相同的情况下,缬沙坦在心血管高危人群中比氨氯地平对心脏发病率和死亡率的抑制作用更大。方法:15〜245名年龄在50岁或50岁以上,已治疗或未治疗的高血压和高心脏事件风险的患者参加了基于缬沙坦或氨氯地平的随机,双盲,平行组比较治疗。治疗的持续时间是由事件决定的,试验一直持续到至少有1450名患者达到主要终点,该终点被定义为心脏死亡率和发病率的总和。来自31个国家的患者接受了平均4.2年的随访。结果:两种治疗均降低了血压,但基于氨氯地平的治疗方案的效果更明显,尤其是在早期阶段(1个月后氨氯地平的血压比缬沙坦组低4.0 / 2.1 mm Hg; 1.5 / 1.3 mm 1年后的Hg;两组之间p <0.001)。主要复合终点发生在缬沙坦组的810例患者中(10.6%,每1000例患者年25.5)和氨氯地平组789例(10.4%,每1000例患者年24.7;危险比1.04,95%CI 0.94-1.15 ,p = 0.49)。解释:治疗组之间心脏病的主要结局没有差异。血压不均等的下降可能是由于特定原因导致的两组之间的差异。这些发现强调了在具有高心血管风险的高血压患者中及时控制血压的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号