...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood pressure. >Progressive effects of valsartan compared with amlodipine in prevention of diabetes according to categories of diabetogenic risk in hypertensive patients: the VALUE trial.
【24h】

Progressive effects of valsartan compared with amlodipine in prevention of diabetes according to categories of diabetogenic risk in hypertensive patients: the VALUE trial.

机译:根据高血压患者的致糖尿病风险类别,缬沙坦与氨氯地平相比在预防糖尿病方面的进展作用:VALUE试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have previously shown that the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan is associated with a lower incidence of new-onset type 2 diabetes than that with the calcium-channel antagonist amlodipine in the treatment of hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk. We have now investigated the benefits of valsartan vs amlodipine in patients of different categories of diabetogenic risk. Some 9995 patients without diabetes at onset participated in VALUE, with average follow-up of 4.2 years. Predictors of new diabetes were analyzed by stepwise logistic regression. A diabetes risk score for each patient was calculated based on a multivariate model. The risk of developing new diabetes in quartiles of risk for the disease was calculated as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). New diabetes was reported in 580 (11.5%) patients on valsartan and in 718 (14.5%) patients on amlodipine (p<0.0001). There was a more than sevenfold rise in the development of new diabetes from the lowest to the highest quartile of risk. When study treatment was included in the risk model, the odds in favor of valsartan in preventing new diabetes progressively increased with higher risk. Fifty-two (4.03%) patients developed diabetes on valsartan and 50 (4.14%) patients on amlodipine in the lowest quartile of risk, 73 (5.70%) patients on valsartan and 83 (6.81%) patients on amlodipine in the second quartile, and 126 (10.27%) patients on valsartan and 160 (12.58%) patients on amlodipine in the third quartile. The difference between treatments was highly significant in quartile 4 with 329 (26.68%) patients developing new diabetes on valsartan vs 425 (33.57%) patients on amlodipine (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.86, p = 0.0002). The number of patients needed for treatment for the duration of the trial in order to gain the benefit of valsartan over amlodipine in preventing one new case of diabetes was 43 in the third quartile and 15 in the fourth quartile of risk categories. We conclude that valsartan compared with amlodipine reduces the risk of developing diabetes mellitus, particularly in hypertensive patients with the highest susceptibility for development of diabetes.
机译:先前我们已经表明,在高心血管风险的高血压患者中,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂缬沙坦与新发2型糖尿病的发生率比钙通道拮抗剂氨氯地平低。现在我们已经研究了缬沙坦与氨氯地平在不同类型糖尿病风险中的益处。约有9995例无糖尿病发作的患者参加了VALUE治疗,平均随访时间为4.2年。通过逐步逻辑回归分析新糖尿病的预测因素。基于多变量模型计算每位患者的糖尿病风险评分。在患疾病的四分位数中患上新糖尿病的风险以具有95%置信区间(CI)的优势比(OR)计算。据报道有580名(11.5%)的缬沙坦患者和718名(14.5%)的氨氯地平患者出现新的糖尿病(p <0.0001)。从最低风险到最高风险四分位数,新糖尿病的发生率增长了七倍以上。当将研究治疗方法纳入风险模型时,缬沙坦预防新发糖尿病的几率随着风险的增加而逐步增加。风险最低的四分位数中有52名(4.03%)的患者在缬沙坦上患糖尿病,氨氯地平发生50例(4.14%),在第二个四分位数中在缬沙坦中患73例(5.70%)患者和氨氯地平83例(6.81%)在第三四分位数中,使用缬沙坦治疗的患者为126(10.27%),使用氨氯地平治疗的患者为160(12.58%)。四分之四的治疗之间的差异是非常显着的,其中329名(26.68%)缬沙坦患者患有新糖尿病,而425名(33.57%)氨氯地平患者(OR = 0.72,95%CI 0.61-0.86,p = 0.0002)。在试验过程中,为了获得缬沙坦优于氨氯地平在预防一例新发糖尿病方面需要治疗的患者人数,在危险类别的第三个四分位数中为43%,在第四个四分位数中为15个。我们得出的结论是,与氨氯地平相比,缬沙坦可降低罹患糖尿病的风险,特别是在糖尿病易感性最高的高血压患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号