...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.
【24h】

Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

机译:氯沙坦和卡托普利对急性心肌梗死后高危患者死亡率和发病率的影响:OPTIMAAL随机试验。血管紧张素II拮抗剂Losartan对心肌梗死的最佳试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: ACE inhibitors attenuate the detrimental effects of angiotensin II, and improve survival and reduce morbidity in patients with acute myocardial infarction and evidence of heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction. Selective antagonism of the angiotensin type 1 receptor represents an alternative approach to inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. We did a multicentre, randomised trial to test the hypothesis that the angiotensin II antagonist losartan would be superior or non-inferior to the ACE inhibitor captopril in decreasing all-cause mortality in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: 5477 patients 50 years of age or older (mean age 67.4 years [SD 9.8]), with confirmed acute myocardial infarction and heart failure during the acute phase or a new Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction, were recruited from 329 centres in seven European countries. Patients were randomly assigned and titrated to a target dose of losartan (50 mg once daily) or captopril (50 mg three times daily) as tolerated. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: There were 946 deaths during a mean follow-up of 2.7 (0.9) years: 499 (18%) in the losartan group and 447 (16%) in the captopril group (relative risk 1.13 [95% CI 0.99-1.28], p=0.07). The results for the secondary and tertiary endpoints were as follows: sudden cardiac death or resuscitated cardiac arrest 239 (9%) versus 203 (7%), 1.19 (0.98-1.43), p=0.07, and fatal or non-fatal reinfarction 384 (14%) versus 379 (14%), 1.03 (0.89-1.18), p=0.72. The all-cause hospital admission rates were 1806 (66%) versus 1774 (65%), 1.03 (0.97-1.10), p=0.37. Losartan was significantly better tolerated than captopril, with fewer patients discontinuing study medication (458 [17%] vs 624 [23%], 0.70 [0.62-0.79], p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: Since we saw a non-significant difference in total mortality in favour of captopril, ACE inhibitors should remain first-choice treatment in patients after complicated acute myocardial infarction. Losartan cannot be generally recommended in this population. However, it was better tolerated than captopril, and was associated with significantly fewer discontinuations. Although the role of losartan in patients intolerant of ACE inhibition is not clearly defined, it can be considered in such patients.
机译:背景:ACEI抑制剂可减轻血管紧张素II的有害作用,并改善急性心肌梗死和心力衰竭或左心室功能不全患者的生存率并降低其发病率。 1型血管紧张素受体的选择性拮抗代表了抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统的另一种方法。我们进行了一项多中心随机试验,以检验在降低急性心肌梗死后高危患者的全因死亡率方面,血管紧张素II拮抗剂洛沙坦优于或不逊于ACE抑制剂卡托普利。方法:从美国加利福尼亚州的329个中心招募了5477名50岁以上(平均年龄67.4岁[SD 9.8])的患者,这些患者在急性期被确诊为急性心肌梗塞和心力衰竭,或者发生了新的Q波前梗塞或再梗塞。七个欧洲国家。随机分配患者,并按耐受剂量滴加目标剂量的氯沙坦(每天一次50毫克)或卡托普利(每天三次50毫克)。主要终点是全因死亡率。分析是按意向进行的。结果:在平均随访2.7(0.9)年中有946例死亡:氯沙坦组为499(18%),卡托普利组为447(16%)(相对危险度1.13 [95%CI 0.99-1.28] ,p = 0.07)。次要和三次要点的结果如下:心脏骤然死亡或心脏骤停复苏239(9%)对203(7%),1.19(0.98-1.43),p = 0.07,以及致命或非致命性再梗死384 (14%)对379(14%),1.03(0.89-1.18),p = 0.72。全因住院率为1806(66%)对1774(65%),1.03(0.97-1.10),p = 0.37。氯沙坦的耐受性明显好于卡托普利,停药的患者更少(458 [17%] vs 624 [23%],0.70 [0.62-0.79],p <0.0001)。解释:由于我们发现总死亡率在卡托普利方面无显着差异,因此ACEI抑制剂应作为复杂急性心肌梗死患者的首选治疗方法。在这种人群中一般不推荐使用氯沙坦。但是,它的耐受性优于卡托普利,并且停药的次数明显减少。尽管尚不清楚氯沙坦在不耐受ACE抑制剂的患者中的作用,但可以在此类患者中考虑使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号