首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Comparison of the effect of two systems for the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding.
【24h】

Comparison of the effect of two systems for the promotion of exclusive breastfeeding.

机译:比较两种系统促进纯母乳喂养的效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Promotion of breastfeeding is an important child-survival intervention, yet little is known about which promotional strategies are the most effective. We aimed to compare the effects on rates of breastfeeding of two systems for promotion of breastfeeding in Brazil--a hospital-based system and the same system combined with a programme of home visits. METHODS: In February, 2001, maternity staff from two hospitals in Pernambuco, Brazil, were trained according to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI). In a randomised trial between March and August, 2001, 350 mothers giving birth at these hospitals were assigned ten postnatal home visits to promote and support breastfeeding (n=175) or no home visits (n=175). Breastfeeding practices were studied on days 1, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 by researchers unaware of group allocation. The primary outcome measure was the rate of exclusive breastfeeding from birth to 6 months. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The hospital-training intervention achieved a high rate (70%) of exclusive breastfeeding in the hospitals, but this rate was not sustained at home and at 10 days of age only 30% of infants were exclusively breastfed The patterns of exclusive breastfeeding in the two trial groups for days 10-180 differed significantly (p<0.0001), with a mean aggregated prevalence of 45% among the group assigned home visits compared with 13% for the group assigned none. INTERPRETATION: The BFHI achieves high rates of exclusive breastfeeding in hospital; however, in Brazil at least, the rates fall rapidly thereafter. Reliance on the BFHI as a strategy for breastfeeding promotion should be reassessed. A combination of promotional systems (hospital-based and in the community) is needed.
机译:背景:促进母乳喂养是一项重要的儿童生存干预措施,但对于哪种促进策略最有效的知之甚少。我们旨在比较两种在巴西推广母乳喂养的系统对母乳喂养率的影响-这两种系统是基于医院的系统,并且是结合家庭访问计划的同一系统。方法:2001年2月,根据巴西爱婴医院倡议(BFHI)对来自巴西伯南布哥州两家医院的产妇进行了培训。在2001年3月至2001年8月之间的一项随机试验中,为这些医院分娩的350名母亲分配了十次产后家访,以促进和支持母乳喂养(n = 175)或不进行家访(n = 175)。研究人员在第1天,第10天,第30天,第60天,第90天,第120天,第150天和第180天对母乳喂养习惯进行了研究,他们没有意识到他们的分配情况。主要结果指标是从出生到六个月的纯母乳喂养率。分析是按意向进行的。结果:医院培训干预措施在医院中实现了纯母乳喂养的高比例(70%),但是这个比例在家里并没有持续,并且在10天大时,只有30%的婴儿是纯母乳喂养的。两个试验组在10-180天的时间差异显着(p <0.0001),平均总患病率在分配家庭访问的组中为45%,而没有分配访问组的为13%。解释:BFHI在医院实现了高纯母乳喂养率;但是,至少在巴西,此后此比率迅速下降。应该重新评估将BFHI作为促进母乳喂养的策略。需要结合促销系统(基于医院和社区)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号