首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial--the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II (see comments)
【24h】

Effect of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomised trial--the Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II (see comments)

机译:氯沙坦与卡托普利的比较对有症状心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响:一项随机试验-氯沙坦心力衰竭生存研究ELITE II(参见评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The ELITE study showed an association between the angiotensin II antagonist losartan and an unexpected survival benefit in elderly heart-failure patients, compared with captopril, an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. We did the ELITE II Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study to confirm whether losartan is superior to captopril in improving survival and is better tolerated. METHODS: We undertook a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial of 3,152 patients aged 60 years or older with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure and ejection fraction of 40% or less. Patients, stratified for beta-blocker use, were randomly assigned losartan (n=1,578) titrated to 50 mg once daily or captopril (n=1,574) titrated to 50 mg three times daily. The primary and secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, and sudden death or resuscitated arrest. We assessed safety and tolerability. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Median follow-up was 555 days. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (11.7 vs 10.4% average annual mortality rate) or sudden death or resuscitated arrests (9.0 vs 7.3%) between the two treatment groups (hazard ratios 1.13 [95.7% CI 0.95-1.35], p=0.16 and 1.25 [95% CI 0.98-1.60], p=0.08). Significantly fewer patients in the losartan group (excluding those who died) discontinued study treatment because of adverse effects (9.7 vs 14.7%, p<0.001), including cough (0.3 vs 2.7%).
机译:背景:ELITE研究表明,与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂卡托普利相比,血管紧张素II拮抗剂洛沙坦与老年心衰患者的意外生存获益相关。我们进行了ELITE II Losartan心力衰竭生存研究,以确认氯沙坦在改善生存率和耐受性方面是否优于卡托普利。方法:我们进行了一项双盲,随机,对照试验,研究对象为3,152名60岁或60岁以上的纽约心脏协会II-IV级心力衰竭且射血分数不超过40%的患者。随机分组接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者,每天随机分配一次氯沙坦(n = 1,578)滴定至50 mg或每天3次将卡托普利(n = 1,574)滴定至50 mg。主要终点和次要终点是全因死亡率,猝死或复苏停滞。我们评估了安全性和耐受性。分析是按意向进行的。结果:中位随访时间为555天。两个治疗组之间的全因死亡率(年平均死亡率分别为11.7和10.4%)或猝死或复苏的逮捕(9.0和7.3%)之间没有显着差异(危险比1.13 [95.7%CI 0.95-1.35], p = 0.16和1.25 [95%CI 0.98-1.60],p = 0.08)。氯沙坦组中的患者(不包括死亡患者)因不良反应(9.7 vs 14.7%,p <0.001),包括咳嗽(0.3 vs 2.7%)而中止研究治疗的人数明显减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号